Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm not asking you to admit that a condom is 100% safe.
I cannot guarantee that a condoms is 100 percent safe sorry, i wish i could, but well you know, stuff happens.
The question was, do you admit that millions of people could be saved the heartache of STD's if they practiced safe sex and used condoms?
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobwell you see i cannot say that, considering that i cannot guarantee a condoms safety, id like to, but, its impossible to guarantee. On the other hand, one way to guarantee it, is to practice the Bibles superlative wisdom.
I'm not asking you to admit that a condom is 100% safe.
The question was, do you admit that millions of people could be saved the heartache of STD's if they practiced safe sex and used condoms?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI see, you can't admit that millions of people would be spared STD's if they use a condom. It seems your pride and ego gets in the way again O'Spiritual Eunuch.
well you see i cannot say that, considering that i cannot guarantee a condoms safety, id like to, but, its impossible to guarantee. On the other hand, one way to guarantee it, is to practice the Bibles superlative wisdom.
Originally posted by Proper KnobIf you are going to screw around, by all means use one. However, it is not full proof and the only way of being completely safe is to not screw around.
I see, you can't admit that millions of people would be spared STD's if they use a condom. It seems your pride and ego gets in the way again O'Spiritual Eunuch.
It's like the clean needle argument. Are we led to believe that taking drugs should be OK so long as they are given clean needles and monitored so they can't overdose?
Originally posted by whodeyScrew around? Are you 10 years old?
If you are going to screw around, by all means use one. However, it is not full proof and the only way of being completely safe is to not screw around.
It's like the clean needle argument. Are we led to believe that taking drugs should be OK so long as they are given clean needles and monitored so they can't overdose?
Originally posted by whodeyMany people are so addicted to drugs that they will continue to use drugs no matter what the consequences and risks are. Surely, in these cases it's much better that these people use drugs in a safe and clean enviroment than to send them out onto the streets where they form a health hazard for themselves and others?
If you are going to screw around, by all means use one. However, it is not full proof and the only way of being completely safe is to not screw around.
It's like the clean needle argument. Are we led to believe that taking drugs should be OK so long as they are given clean needles and monitored so they can't overdose?
Not to mention theft and robbery and such.
Originally posted by Great King RatAnd the same can't be said of sex?
Many people are so addicted to drugs that they will continue to use drugs no matter what the consequences and risks are. Surely, in these cases it's much better that these people use drugs in a safe and clean enviroment than to send them out onto the streets where they form a health hazard for themselves and others?
Not to mention theft and robbery and such.
What do we do with addictions? You say we should provide safety. I say we should focus more on rehab.
Is a life spent all drugged up better than one that ends early or has one already lost their life?
5 edits
-Removed-Thats bitter great pudding, waz up, robbie no giving you any attention, well, you have only yourself to blame. Right, so you have got some attention, don't you feel better? Now you can go away happy.
Before that lets consider your contribution to this thread.......woa, where did that cactus spring from, that desert hawk, woa its suddenly hot in here, a veritable desert region....i see a mirage, its the worlds largest doughnut with your contribution in the centre.....amazing.......one minute I was in the frozen North the next in a desert region of nothingness.