Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson fired from TV show...

Originally posted by JS357
If any life style people chose were OK, people of your religion wouldn't be persecuted.

I'll ask again:
Is any life style ok as long as it's what that person or a group of people want?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, i like his approach, homosexuality is illogical, thats interesting. But its a pity that anyone who takes a stance against something that is unnatural should be suspended, but its a reflection of the times we live in. Don't dare draw attention to the highest ever AIDS figures among homosexual men since records began, they cannot handle reality.

So much for the A & E reality show for JW's. :'(

Robbie's Dynasty will never see the light of day.

Originally posted by galveston75
I'll ask again:
Is any life style ok as long as it's what that person or a group of people want?

You must mean "OK by God" since that's what is behind your objection. So anyone is welcome to answer this parallel question: Is being of g75's religion OK by God as long as it's what g75 and his group wants?

Let's get all the religious bigots and targets of bigots out in the open, so we can see how many of us are in both camps.

Originally posted by whodey
So much for the A & E reality show for JW's. :'(

Robbie's Dynasty will never see the light of day.

would you appear on my show whodey, i could sit you beside Sarah Palin if you promise not to drool all over her.

Originally posted by galveston75
So is living ones own chosen lifestyle progress? Is any life style ok as long as it's what that person or a group of people want?

Emphatically YES.

Providing those choices do not infringe on the liberties
or quality of life of others.

Originally posted by galveston75
I agree but a person has no right to express his opinion without repercussions in just everyday life such as with a religious view in mind especially when he was asked for it?

That's obviously correct.

Originally posted by galveston75
I'll ask again:
Is any life style ok as long as it's what that person or a group of people want?

I'll answer again: YES

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Emphatically YES.

Providing those choices do not infringe on the liberties
or quality of life of others.

Indeed.

Your freedom to do something should be curtailed only by it's effects on others.

Then you have to balance the two competing freedoms.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, i like his approach, homosexuality is illogical, thats interesting. But its a pity that anyone who takes a stance against something that is unnatural should be suspended, but its a reflection of the times we live in. Don't dare draw attention to the highest ever AIDS figures among homosexual men since records began, they cannot handle reality.

can you please answer the question from page one regarding blood transfusions, although directed at galveston i would also like your answer?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
would you appear on my show whodey, i could sit you beside Sarah Palin if you promise not to drool all over her.

I would be unable to promise such a thing, since she has such a beautiful mind.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Indeed.

Your freedom to do something should be curtailed only by it's effects on others.

Then you have to balance the two competing freedoms.

Yes, unfortunately for some of the god squad the
"Freedom to Persecute Minorities" is not a freedom that
is protected!

Originally posted by RBHILL
I would have said even the good that we do is sin in the eyes of God.

Then, I would not object to you being fired or suspended....

Just kidding.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Yes, unfortunately for some of the god squad the
"Freedom to Persecute Minorities" is not a freedom that
is protected!

Indeed.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
The people asking the questions [b]did want to hear his views
his employers didn't!
And this story has nothing to do with Christianity.
(Except that his religion may have contributed to his bigotry)[/b]

I did not see any bigotry in his statement of his religious view. You and the gay rights groups seems to be imagining hate speech where none was stated by him.