eve and her std's

-Removed-

why don't you tell us what the bible teaches, you are a Christian are you not? why don't you tell us? I don't care whether there is agreement or not, lets hear what you believe and why for a change. You seem openly critical of the views of others as you yourself have stated, lets subject your beliefs to criticism for a change? shall we ?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
It's up to Galveston to provide the evidence, he's made the claim after all. He has to substantiate it.

not quite, there are two concurrent claims, one that FMF has an agenda of hatred and one which insists that he has not.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I actually started on the piano and then moved to drums. I have a degree in music, there is no degeneration here.

curses! its a sad day when one cannot rip a drummer for being a drummer!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
not quite, there are two concurrent claims, one that FMF has an agenda of hatred and one which insists that he has not.

There is only one claim, and that is Galveston's. It's up to him to substantiate it.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
There is only one claim, and that is Galveston's. It's up to him to substantiate it.

no FMF has made a counter claim.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no FMF has made a counter claim.

What? I don't have an agenda of hatred?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
What? I don't have an agenda of hatred?

yes, what else?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes, what else?

That's a rejection of the original claim, not a counter claim.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
That's a rejection of the original claim, not a counter claim.

yes but never the less its an unsubstantiated assertion.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes, what else?

Your being hypocritical here. When FMF made his claim about Galveston being pessimistic you told him he had to substantiate that claim, which he did. Now Galveston has made a claim about FMF having an 'agenda of hatred' it's up to FMF to prove he doesn't. You're trying to have it both ways here it seems.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Your being hypocritical here. When FMF made his claim about Galveston being pessimistic you told him he had to substantiate that claim, which he did. Now Galveston has made a claim about FMF having an 'agenda of hatred' it's up to FMF to prove he doesn't. You're trying to have it both ways here it seems.

! don't believe FMF did substantiate his claim. I have consistently stated that what i thought he did was caricature galvestons position, never the less that aside, its not about me is about the claims that have been made.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i don't believe FMF did substantiate his claim, i have consistently stated htat what i thought he did was caricature galvestons position, never the less that aside, its not about me is about the claims that have been made.

The point is that FMF substantiated his claim, irrespective of whether you agree with it. Galveston has made his claim, he has to substantiate it just like FMF had to do. You can't have it both ways.

-Removed-

Lets see. Up to this date this question has been presented to me and Robbie at least a half a dozen times that I recall. And I do believe that on all those occasions I have answered them as well as Robbie.
So if you wish to search and review those answers instead of me answering them "again" do the reasearch at the previous postings for my answer to this question.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
It's up to Galveston to provide the evidence, he's made the claim after all. He has to substantiate it.

Substantiate what?