Originally posted by FMF
So if making personal remarks about someone's personality makes galveston75 "feel good about" himself, then it is something you intend to encourage?

No, galveston made personal remarks because of the way you made him feel and have treated him, it stands to reason that if you had made him feel good about himself he would not have reacted in the way that he did. My goal is to discourage all types of personal remarks and criticism of personalities as i have repeatedly tried to emphasise.

Originally posted by FMF
Of course you can say.

No i cannot say, sorry.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
My goal is to discourage all types of personal remarks and criticism of personalities as i have repeatedly tried to emphasise.

So your message to galveston75 is that he should stop his "personal remarks and criticism of personalities"?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No i cannot say, sorry.

You mean you refuse to say? How predictable.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
You mean you refuse to say? How predictable.

no in order to do so i would need to be critical of Galveston and FMF, something that grieves me deeply and would contravene my new philosophy of making others feel good about themselves. Please try to understand.

Originally posted by FMF
So your message to galveston75 is that he should stop his "personal remarks and criticism of personalities"?

as should we all FMF, not just Galveston.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no in order to do so i would need to be critical of Galveston and FMF, something that grieves me deeply and would contravene my new philosophy of making others feel good about themselves. Please try to understand.

Grieves you deeply?! LOL!!!!

Perspective please Rob. I know you have a penchant for sensationalism, but this is a little OTT.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
as should we all FMF, not just Galveston.

So you don't think his criticism of my personality on page 25 was justified or, indeed, acceptable?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no in order to do so i would need to be critical of Galveston and FMF, something that grieves me deeply and would contravene my new philosophy of making others feel good about themselves. Please try to understand.

I see. But it was perfectly okay only yesterday when you gave your opinion as to whether FMF had substantiated his claim regarding Galveston. Yet today when the reverse is required you fall strangely silent.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No, galveston made personal remarks because of the way you made him feel and have treated him, it stands to reason that if you had made him feel good about himself he would not have reacted in the way that he did. My goal is to discourage all types of personal remarks and criticism of personalities as i have repeatedly tried to emphasise.

So what was your agenda when you called me fatboy in a previous thread

Originally posted by FMF
So you don't think his criticism of my personality on page 25 was justified or, indeed, acceptable?

Its not about you FMF, its not about Galveston, its not about me. I don't think personal criticism for its own sake is justified nor particularly valid that is why i am making stringent efforts to eradicate it from the forum. I realise that it is rocking the boat and unpopular, never the less i plan to lead by way of example.

Originally posted by deenny
So what was your agenda when you called me fatboy in a previous thread

Just a few days ago, in a pretty short space of time, robbie was banging on about me being an insidious and arrogant slanderer, simply an internet troll [something he stated over and over and over again], slanderous and slimy, that I had low self-esteem, I was totally banal, a tiresome bore, a sadistic creature, that I desired attention, that I am just airing my personal grievances, that I have perverse needs, that I am dishonest, have no integrity, and so on and so forth.

You can read some discussion of it here Thread 151000

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I see. But it was perfectly okay only yesterday when you gave your opinion as to whether FMF had substantiated his claim regarding Galveston. Yet today when the reverse is required you fall strangely silent.

Indeed, my philosophy is conceptually new, I still have not decided upon a name for it yet.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not about you FMF, its not about Galveston, its not about me.

galveston75's claim that I have "an agenda of hatred" certainly is "about" me.

Originally posted by deenny
So what was your agenda when you called me fatboy in a previous thread

I apologise wholeheartedly for calling you fatboy and if it did not make you feel good about yourself if you are on the slightly podgy side of things than I apologise for that too and will take rigorous measures to make sure it does not happen again.