Evidence please

Originally posted by @dj2becker
It's just interesting that you always complain about me asking you a question that you have supposedly answered but haven't even been able to reference one of these supposed answers.

Why on earth would I want to reference them?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You would be better suited to create a list of the questions that I have asked that you have already answered and provide a link to your answers to those particular questions.

So you want me to go back and find stuff for you that I have already said to you in the past and that I know you read and that you ignored deliberately? Why would I want to jump through that hoop for you day in day out?

Originally posted by @fmf
Why on earth would I want to reference them?

Exactly, why on earth would you want to reference them if they don't exist?

Originally posted by @fmf
So you want me to go back and find stuff for you that I have already said to you in the past and that I know you read and that you ignored deliberately? Why would I want to jump through that hoop for you day in day out?

If you did it once you would have evidence that I have done it once, if you did it twice you would have evidence that I did it twice etc. At the moment you just have claims with absolutely no evidence to support them.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Exactly, why on earth would you want to reference them if they don't exist?

If "they don't exist" and you are asking a new question that moves the conversation along, then I would simply answer it. I have answered or responded to hundreds and hundreds of your posts, probably more like thousands and thousands. I don't have any problem addressing the things you put to me at all. But I am not interested in repeating myself when I perceive as trolling with your ignore-ask-again routine.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If you did it once you would have evidence that I have done it once, if you did it twice you would have evidence that I did it twice etc. At the moment you just have claims with absolutely no evidence to support them.

Why do I need "evidence", that convinces you, for me to decide that I think your debate-tactic is a trolling gimmick?

Originally posted by @fmf
If "they don't exist" and you are asking a new question that moIves the conversation along, then I would simply answer it. I have answered or responded to hundreds and hundreds of your posts, probably more like thousands and thousands. I don't have any problem addressing the things you put to me at all. But I am not interested in repeating myself when I perceive as trolling with your ignore-ask-again routine.

It is just a huge coincidence that all the questions that have you on the ropes are the ones that are labelled as 'ignore-ask-again' routine questions that you refuse to answer because you have supposedly answered them before even though you cannot provide a reference of this supposed answer.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
It is just a huge coincidence that all the questions that have you on the ropes are the ones that are labelled as 'ignore-ask-again' routine questions that you refuse to answer because you have supposedly answered them before even though you cannot provide a reference of this supposed answer.

If you're denying that you do what I am claiming you do, if you are denying that you are trolling, if you are insisting that you are not a jerk but that you debate me and others here in good faith and in a grown up fashion, then that is your prerogative. You should call it how you see it, just as I do.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
...all the questions that have you on the ropes...

I don't think there are any of these. I think you might be getting a bit puffed up.

Originally posted by @fmf
If you're denying that you do what I am claiming you do, if you are denying that you are trolling, if you are insisting that you are not a jerk but that you debate me and others here in good faith and in a grown up fashion, then that is your prerogative. You should call it how you see it, just as I do.

If you are going to make claims that I have ignored what you have said yet can't even reference when or where you said it and you want me or anyone else to take you seriously or pretend that you are the grown up in this discussion then that is your prerogative.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If you are going to make claims that I have ignored what you have said yet can't even reference when or where you said it and you want me or anyone else to take you seriously or pretend that you are the grown up in this discussion then that is your prerogative.

I don't have to convince you or even expose you to anybody. If I reach the conclusion that you are trolling me then that is the end of that strand of the so-called 'conversation'. You are not entitled to anything further in that situation. If other posters think I am lying about you, so be it.

Originally posted by @fmf
I don't have to convince you or even expose you to anybody. If I reach the conclusion that you are trolling me then that is the end of that strand of the so-called 'conversation'. You are not entitled to anything further in that situation. If other posters think I am lying about you, so be it.

Claims should only be met with evidence when it suits your purposes as always.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Claims should only be met with evidence when it suits your purposes as always.

You have my reason why I perceive you as trolling me. I don't care if you don't accept that reason.

Originally posted by @fmf
You have my reason why I perceive you as trolling me. I don't care if you don't accept that reason.

Of course you won't because you have no evidence to support your reason anyway.