Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell of course my analysis is subjective. Why would I be claiming otherwise? I think it's measured and not vitriolic.
If you want to disguise your subjective vitriolic drivel as an honest appraisal be my guest. You haven't fooled me.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIn education. In the health sector. In the fields of psychology and psychiatry. Generally, when dealing with people who are evidently damaged and unable to interact normally. Here on planet Earth, in other words.
In which part of the world does saying that someone is intellectually impaired not amount to vitriol? Planet FMF?
Originally posted by @fmfI'm pleased that can be decerned here. I don't much fancy a trip to planet FMF.
In education. In the health sector. In the fields of psychology and psychiatry. Generally, when dealing with people who are evidently damaged and unable to interact normally. Here on planet Earth, in other words.
🙂
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfOk so I'm intellectually impaired, psychologically abused, and unable to interact normally. Anything else you want to add to your 'honest appraisal'?
In education. In the health sector. In the fields of psychology and psychiatry. Generally, when dealing with people who are evidently damaged and unable to interact normally. Here on planet Earth, in other words.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou conduct yourself like an adolescent.
Ok so I'm intellectually impaired, psychologically abused, and unable to interact normally. Anything else you want to add to your 'honest appraisal'?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerpsychologically abused - you were the one who described this in detail. Thread 170817 page 42 onwards, and Thread 173077 page 5 onwards, and elsewhere too.
Excellent, is that all you've got?
unable to interact normally - that's my take on your behaviour, yes. You ignore what people say to you in conversations and then proceed as if they hadn't said what they said. Not normal.
intellectually impaired - well you can't remember the content of conversations you've been in, so either you're intellectually impaired or it's done for trolling effect and online disinhibition kicks, you decide which it is
conduct yourself like an adolescent - judging by your forum persona you probably wouldn't get on to the university course I teach, and you'd seem very childish compared to the 18-20 year olds that I deal with, too childish to survive semester 1, I think.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfThanks for sharing your opinions.
psychologically abused - you were the one who described this in detail. Thread 170817 page 42 onwards, and Thread 173077 page 5 onwards, and elsewhere too.
unable to interact normally - that's my take on your behaviour, yes. You ignore what people say to you in conversations and then proceed as if they hadn't said what they said. ...[text shortened]... h compared to the 18-20 year olds that I deal with, too childish to survive semester 1, I think.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo, now you know. When I say something like 'We have already discussed this; my stance hasn't changed; I feel no need to repeat myself' it means exactly that. And when you ask me a question that does not ignore what I have said in the past and seeks to move the dialogue forward, I'm happy to field your attempts to put me "on the ropes".
Thanks for sharing your opinions.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmf“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”
So, now you know. When I say something like 'We have already discussed this; my stance hasn't changed; I feel no need to repeat myself' it means exactly that. And when you ask me a question that does not ignore what I have said in the past and seeks to move the dialogue forward, I'm happy to field your attempts to put me "on the ropes".
― Adolf Hitler
-Removed-the Bible is evidence and with science and history as proofs. However, if a person is staunch in their thinking that it can not, then no matter what is said, no proof will ever be proof enough.
Micro biology is a science that many evilutionists will not accept. Yet their findings will show it impossible to have evilution. There is an order to science, not a disorder. Only if cell structure had disorder would things change. If evillution were true, then each time you would cut yourself there would be a change in your condition. Another finger growing, or another nail or sometimg else. Yet it does not. skin grows back. Even your finger prints will be the exact same
Originally posted by @pudgenikEvilution?!
the Bible is evidence and with science and history as proofs. However, if a person is staunch in their thinking that it can not, then no matter what is said, no proof will ever be proof enough.
Micro biology is a science that many evilutionists will not accept. Yet their findings will show it impossible to have evilution. There is an order to science, n ...[text shortened]... sometimg else. Yet it does not. skin grows back. Even your finger prints will be the exact same
Well, what you describe I guess certainly isn't evolution.