Many fail to realize that both sides of the materialistic and creation debates share the same evidence, since we share the same reality. We don’t live in different places experiencing things in different universes, so the evidence doesn’t separate us; the explanation of the evidence does.
Many who say there is no evidence for God view evidence as if the only explanation narratives attached to the universe matter that show they are correct, but the same evidence is there for all, so they refuse to acknowledge any narrative or explanation that doesn’t agree with them.
That is their huge circular claim, but they refuse to move off of it because, as soon as they do, they lose one of their favorite talking points: there is no evidence for God.
Truth is never changed by human opinion; it is changed only by reality. Our opinions about reality do not change reality, but they do change our perceptions of it; when that happens, we reveal the kind of people we really are as we change to accumulate and accommodate our opinions.
Science is about making observations and drawing conclusions from them.
As a religious person, you're working backwards. You've already formed a conclusion and search for evidence to support it. That's flawed logically.
You claim scientists don't accept views that don't agree with them. That's false; new information challenging current theories are integral and common aspects of science. The differing views must be based in facts and reason; this is where creationism repeatedly fails.