Originally posted by @dj2beckerI've answered this before. The answer hasn't changed.
If someone else were to believe that murder were not evil would it also not matter one whit if their moral reasoning were correct?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don’t think anyone ought to let themselves be fooled by what is going on here.
You're not fooling anyone FMF. We both know that was the first time I asked you that question and we also both know why you are dodging it.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat "tight spot"? What "lying"?
Indeed. It seems lying to get out of a tight spot doesn't bother you in the least.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am not "lying" at all. And you don't have me in any kind of "tight spot".
Ah yes forgot the next step is play dumb.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerMy belief is that murder is "evil" for the reasons I have given. If someone else thinks murder is not "evil", then that person and I obviously disagree about whether or not murder is "evil". Were you unable to discern that from what I said?
If someone else were to believe that murder were not evil would it also not matter one whit if their moral reasoning were correct?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am not "lying" about anything.
Lying about lying is also fine for someone with no moral absolutes I imagine?
Originally posted by @fmfMaybe you should take a deep breath and read my question again.
My belief is that murder is "evil" for the reasons I have given. If someone else thinks murder is not "evil", then that person and I obviously disagree about whether or not murder is "evil". Were you unable to discern that from what I said?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't need to. You have asked variants of it countless times. You know what my stance is. I don’t need to restate it. Another example is homosexual sex. You think it's immoral for the reasons you have given. And I don't think it's immoral for the reasons I have given. It doesn't matter to me if you think that I am not "correct".
Maybe you should take a breath and read my question again.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYour side of this conversation seems to have deteriorated into simply calling me a liar.
If there are no moral absolutes why would it even really matter if you did lie?
We have discussed the morality of deceit before as you know. I refer you to that.
Originally posted by @fmfSince there are no moral absolutes I guess any lie is morally acceptable as long as you can rationalize it. I guess that really applies to any action. I see apathist was even rationalizing rape on another thread.
I don't need to. You have asked variants of it countless times. You know what my stance is. I don’t need to restate it. Another example is homosexual sex. You think it's immoral for the reasons you have given. And I don't think it's immoral for the reasons I have given. It doesn't matter to me if you think that I am not "correct".