Originally posted by @dj2beckerPeople instituting governments and a god instituting governments are like opposites. It is sheer sophistry to suggest otherwise.
Indeed God gave people free will, people didn't give themselves free will, free will was instituted by God. Governments are the product of people with free will, so in essence God instituted governments by allowing free will.
Did your god figure establish and set up - and ordain - the Nazi government?
Originally posted by @fmfIf the word forced does not appear then it is by the free will of the people that God instituted government since God ordained people to have free will.
The word "forced" does not appear in Romans 13:1. Just the words "established" and "put in place", or in other versions, "ordained" and "set up" and "instituted". And by whom? "People"? No. By your god figure.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerRomans 13:1 is not about free will. It's about your god figure instituting governments.
Explain to me a scenario in which God establishes a government without the use of people with free will.
Originally posted by @fmfNo they are not. It is sheer sophistry to suggest God would force people to do things against their will.
People instituting governments and a god instituting governments are like opposites. It is sheer sophistry to suggest otherwise.
Did your god figure establish and set up - and ordain - the Nazi government?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerRomans 13:1 does not mention the words "force", "allow", "free will" or "people". It mentions that there is no government that was not set up by god. Was the Nazi government ordained and put in place by your god?
If the word forced does not appear then it is by the free will of the people that God instituted government since God ordained people to have free will.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThen why does Romans 13:2 say "Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."
It is sheer sophistry to suggest God would force people to do things against their will.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerBy establishing and ordaining governments in accordance with his will, as Romans 13:1 describes him as doing.
How exactly would God institute governments if not by free will?
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerBut Romans 13 isn't talking about that at all. Romans 13 isn't talking about any person's free will. Romans 13 is telling people what they have to do and dictating that they must bend to his will and accept the governments he has instituted.
And why would his will not include allowing people the free will to form governments of their choosing.
Originally posted by @fmfIf the government were to follow the laws of God, rebelling against that would be rebelling against what God has instituted. (i.e his laws). That's why there is a clarification in Acts that we should obey God above men.
Then why does Romans 13:2 say "Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhich governments were following "the laws of God" at the time Romans 13:1 was written? List a few of them.
If the government were to follow the laws of God, rebelling against that would be rebelling against what God has instituted. (i.e his laws). That's why there is a clarification in Acts that we should obey God above men.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you believe the Nazi government was ordained and put in place by your god, as Romans 13 clearly states?
If the government were to follow the laws of God, rebelling against that would be rebelling against what God has instituted. (i.e his laws). That's why there is a clarification in Acts that we should obey God above men.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell that explains the flood. Everything everywhere (except for the fishes) said yes god please kill us all.
No they are not. It is sheer sophistry to suggest God would force people to do things against their will.