@divegeestersaid He does call me a religionst and I let him “get away with it” because I don’t entirely disagree with him. I use the term to sometime describe the attitudes of posters such as sonship or KellyJay because they are deeply into their “churches”. But even though I am not into corporate religion I still follow a religion, so technically FMF is correct. Either way it’s not something that bothers me.
I must say that I'm not used to seeing you waffle like this, but yeah, I get why you would.
@fmfsaid I disagree. I have not advocated anything comparable to sanctimonious Christian-on-Christian holier-than-thou-ism. If you think I have, just say what it is
How many times have you asked Christians here why haven't they attacked another Christian for something they've said? You probably would've had a season ticket to the Coliseum to watch Christians be eaten by the lions.
@suziannesaid How many times have you asked Christians here why haven't they attacked another Christian for something they've said? You probably would've had a season ticket to the Coliseum to watch Christians be eaten by the lions.
How about Christian-on-Christian cage matches?
Worth a giggle, right?
One of the things that's fascinating here is how many of the Christians contradict themselves, then baulk at being asked about it, or stick pridefully to whatever error or inconsistency they have evidently uttered.
And then it's fascinating how they will often not have the integrity to put aside groupism and partisanship and debate and discuss stuff based on principle and belief instead, and tackle the disagreement head on. People with political ideologies are prone to this too sometimes.
Perhaps you're a bit too busy making the same scornful little content-free speeches - day in day out, over and over again, the ones that you have been making for a decade - and following me around the threads like a little puppy dog in order to do it, insisiting that you are ignoring me ~ to realize what debates and discussions are actually going on.
@fmfsaid No, I did not say that. I asked you "What does Christians being eaten by lions have to do with anything?" Both you and Suzianne have mentioned it.
No, you clearly said:
"What does Christians being eaten by lions have to do with anything?
Meaning...
You think it is irrelevant.
That is what you meant.
You meant exactly that cruelty has nothing to do with anything.
If you care to justify that, be my guest. But, it's plain to see, the statement is absurd.
20 Dec '18 04:11
False religion
Back to Top