@philokalia saidYou have mentioned lions and you have mentioned cruelty. Presumably, you're trying to be funny. If it's for my benefit, you are missing the target.
What cruelty were you talking about just now? Do you remember it?
@philokalia saidI don't know. But I do know that you are probably posting as you see fit.
Why would it be for your benefit? Do you presume that I wish to please you? Why?
@fmf saidUmmm, what?
One of the things that's fascinating here is how many of the Christians contradict themselves, then baulk at being asked about it, or stick pridefully to whatever error or inconsistency they have evidently uttered.
And then it's fascinating how they will often not have the integrity to put aside groupism and partisanship and debate and discuss stuff based on principle and bel ...[text shortened]... insisiting that you are ignoring me ~ to realize what debates and discussions are actually going on.
Apparently this makes sense to you, and you are no doubt posting as you see fit, but one suggestion is that if you want to be understood and not ignored, then you could probably make an effort to reference the universe we all live in, instead of your personal fantasyland.
@suzianne saidThe content of the post your are 'responding' to is about behaviour I observe here in this community.
Ummm, what?
Apparently this makes sense to you, and you are no doubt posting as you see fit, but one suggestion is that if you want to be understood and not ignored, then you could probably make an effort to reference the universe we all live in, instead of your personal fantasyland.
-Removed-Because the lions wasn't my point, and here, as usual, right on time, ignoring my actual point, because it's too embarrassing for either of you to confront head on, both of you focusing on trivia to cover up your own behavior.
You both need a new SoP. The old one is more than obvious, and the thing is, neither of you care if it is. Get off your bulldozers.