26 Dec '11 17:55>
3rd bump for either robbie or Gal...?
Originally posted by divegeesterAt this time Galveston might be having lunch with the one or two members of his un-excommunicated family. He might be lunching and discussing how most of their excommunicated family had satanic beliefs.
3rd bump for either robbie or Gal...?
Originally posted by divegeesterIf he could he'd just as soon see us disappear off this planet reguardless of the good that we do in the worldwide teaching work that he feels he's to high and mighty for. He has nothing good to say about anyone and is doing all he can to stop this work we are doing out of love for mankind. So how is someone that is trying to discredit a group of honest Christains from doing what Jesus told us to do not an antichrist?
Just because someone disagrees with you does not automatically justify you calling them the anticghrist - are you aware of how arrogant and offensive this makes you and your organisation sound?
Originally posted by divegeesterI just explained to you what the extream situations would be and might call for that kind of drastic action to be taklen against an older child in ones family.
I asked you a question Gal:
[b]Would you kick a member of your family out of your house, if they decided they were not a JW anymore? Perhaps for example if they became a Moslem?[/b]
Originally posted by Rajk999.............................
At this time Galveston might be having lunch with the one or two members of his un-excommunicated family. He might be lunching and discussing how most of their excommunicated family had satanic beliefs.
Probably Robbie doing the same time over dinner with his family.
Maybe we should stop trying to put a gold ring in a pigs snout and let them be.
Originally posted by galveston75No, as usual you tried to defend your organisations quite arbitary position on disassosiation by presenting a complex set of possible circumstances designed to conjour up a situation when actually more common sense than obedience is in play. I am asking of you a straight-forward to the point in question response for this simple scenario:
I just explained to you what the extream situations would be and might call for that kind of drastic action to be taklen against an older child in ones family.
Did you not read my last post that I accidently posted twice?
I thought that was pretty clear...........and yes that would apply to my household too.
Originally posted by divegeester"If a JW joins another religion, an announcement is made to the congregation to stop associating with him." (WT 10/15/1986 p.31)
No, as usual you tried to defend your organisations quite arbitary position on disassosiation by presenting a complex set of possible circumstances designed to conjour up a situation when actually more common sense than obedience is in play. I am asking of you a straight-forward to the point in question response for this simple scenario:
[b]Would you ...[text shortened]... me a Moslem?
No "satanism", no demonic control just these simple facts - would you do it?[/b]
Originally posted by galveston75Would you ask that family member in that scenrio to stop living in your house. It's a simple question - Yes or no?
"If a JW joins another religion, an announcement is made to the congregation to stop associating with him." (WT 10/15/1986 p.31)
Is this what your referring to?
Originally posted by divegeesterSorry but I thought you'd get the answer from my previous post. I tried but no cigar I guess.
Would you ask that family member in that scenrio to stop living in your house. It's a simple question - Yes or no?
Originally posted by galveston75Thanks for clarifying your position Galv, which I think is absolutely the right one.
Sorry but I thought you'd get the answer from my previous post. I tried but no cigar I guess.
As I explained very clearly I thought, unless that person was causing physical danger to the family or was bringing in some type of satanic worship or something that would disrupt the spiritual conscienceness of the family NO they would not be asked to leave.
Originally posted by divegeesterI'll be back tomorrow. Heading off to bed as I'm not feeling well. C you later...
Thanks for clarifying your position Galv, which I think is absolutely the right one.
I'm still a bit confused about the JW org position on this though, because surely a disfellowshiped person who have left the JWs and become a Moslem, would have to be disassociated with also; how could this happen if they were living in the same house?
The point ...[text shortened]... specially for his immediate family, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.
Originally posted by Rajk999I agree, if they will stop trying to spread their Satanic teachings.
At this time Galveston might be having lunch with the one or two members of his un-excommunicated family. He might be lunching and discussing how most of their excommunicated family had satanic beliefs.
Probably Robbie doing the same time over dinner with his family.
Maybe we should stop trying to put a gold ring in a pigs snout and let them be.