Originally posted by @dj2beckerYes, I would do that.
Maybe if I were one of his patients he would eventually convince me that I was in fact you. 😞
2 edits
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThe irony here of course is that I’m not Romans, so you can’t convince me otherwise. This would be equivalent to you admitting that a lot of sane patients leave you convinced that they are mad thanks to you.
Yes, I would do that.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerGhost’s patients are more nuts when they leave a session with him than when they arrived
The irony here of course is that I’m not Romans, so you can’t convince me otherwise. This would be equivalent to you admitting that a lot of sane patients leave you convinced that they are mad thanks to you.
Originally posted by @romans1009For your interpretation to be correct, you would have to disregard these verses from earlier in the same epistle from John the Apostle.
I think the answer to this was provided in another thread, though not by me.
I think as Christians when we sin, we break fellowship with God, which is why when we sincerely repent and ask for forgiveness, our sins are washed away by the blood of Jesus Christ.
In this respect, it is not unlike the Old Testament in that God informed Jews of the Mosai ...[text shortened]... say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.”
(1 John 1:5-10)
The fact of the matter is that I provided no interpretation. 1 John 3:4-10 is clear and unambiguous in what it says. It is consistent with 1 John 1:5-10. It is consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus during His ministry.
The gospel that you believe in is not consistent with 1 John 3:4-10. The gospel that you believe in is not consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus during His ministry.
You're dishonest in how you interact with people on this forum. You're dishonest with how you interpret scripture.
In this respect, it is not unlike the Old Testament in that God informed Jews of the Mosaic law, Jews could not keep it without error, and God allowed Jews to atone for their sins (failure to keep the law) by sacrificing animals.
The fact of the matter is that vicarious atonement was abrogated by God as revealed by the late OT prophets. That you refuse to acknowledge this fact is even more evidence of your dishonesty.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneI see you’re falsely claiming I’m dishonest as well. Is that the new schtik with the trolls? Did y’all have a meeting and settle on that strategy?
[b]For your interpretation to be correct, you would have to disregard these verses from earlier in the same epistle from John the Apostle.
The fact of the matter is that I provided no interpretation. 1 John 3:4-10 is clear and unambiguous in what it says. It is consistent with 1 John 1:5-10. It is consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus durin ...[text shortened]... OT prophets. That you refuse to acknowledge this fact is even more evidence of your dishonesty.[/b]