Originally posted by @romans1009Evidently you're also dishonest with yourself.
I see you’re falsely claiming I’m dishonest as well. Is that the new schtik with the trolls? Did y’all have a meeting and settle on that strategy?
Originally posted by @thinkofoneSounds like projection on your part, Christ denier. How else could you ignore all the passages and verses in the Bible about Jesus’ divinity, including statements from Jesus Himself.
Evidently you're also dishonest with yourself.
Originally posted by @romans1009In this respect, it is not unlike the Old Testament in that God informed Jews of the Mosaic law, Jews could not keep it without error, and God allowed Jews to atone for their sins (failure to keep the law) by sacrificing animals.
Sounds like projection on your part, Christ denier. How else could you ignore all the passages and verses in the Bible about Jesus’ divinity, including statements from Jesus Himself.
The fact of the matter is that vicarious atonement was abrogated by God as revealed by the late OT prophets. That you refuse to acknowledge this fact is even more evidence of your dishonesty.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneAre you able to cite verses to back that up? Because I believe God did away with repeated and what had become perfunctory sacrifice of animals to atone for sins by Jesus Christ’s one-time sacrifice.
[b]In this respect, it is not unlike the Old Testament in that God informed Jews of the Mosaic law, Jews could not keep it without error, and God allowed Jews to atone for their sins (failure to keep the law) by sacrificing animals.
The fact of the matter is that vicarious atonement was abrogated by God as revealed by the late OT prophets. That you refuse to acknowledge this fact is even more evidence of your dishonesty.[/b]
The New Testament is pretty clear on what Jesus Christ accomplished on the cross and it’s prophesied in the Old Testament as well.
Originally posted by @romans1009Are you able to cite verses to back that up? Because I believe God did away with repeated and what had become perfunctory sacrifice of animals to atone for sins by Jesus Christ’s one-time sacrifice.
Are you able to cite verses to back that up? Because I believe God did away with repeated and what had become perfunctory sacrifice of animals to atone for sins by Jesus Christ’s one-time sacrifice.
The New Testament is pretty clear on what Jesus Christ accomplished on the cross and it’s prophesied in the Old Testament as well.
I have. And you've participated on threads where I have. More dishonesty? What a surprise.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneYou seem to love accusing me of being dishonest. Sounds like projection as a coping mechanism.
[b]Are you able to cite verses to back that up? Because I believe God did away with repeated and what had become perfunctory sacrifice of animals to atone for sins by Jesus Christ’s one-time sacrifice.
I have. And you've participated on threads where I have. More dishonesty? What a surprise.[/b]
How else could you deny/ignore all the evidence for Jesus Christ’s divinity? You refuse to answer questions about it because your position is untenable.
Sad!
2 edits
Originally posted by @romans1009How else could you deny/ignore all the evidence for Jesus Christ’s divinity? You refuse to answer questions about it because your position is untenable.
You seem to love accusing me of being dishonest. Sounds like projection as a coping mechanism.
How else could you deny/ignore all the evidence for Jesus Christ’s divinity? You refuse to answer questions about it because your position is untenable.
Sad!
I don't "ignore all the evidence". I refuted your so-called "evidence" on the "Jesus Identifies Himself As God" thread. It's there for all to see.
I even gave you a chance to make your best case with whatever you might deem as the most definitive passage that Jesus claimed to be God and you refused.
Your dishonesty continues...
Originally posted by @thinkofoneThat’s hardly all the evidence and you haven’t denied what’s there at all.
[b]How else could you deny/ignore all the evidence for Jesus Christ’s divinity? You refuse to answer questions about it because your position is untenable.
I don't "ignore all the evidence". I refuted your so-called "evidence" on the "Jesus Identifies Himself As God" thread. It's there for all to see.
I even gave you a chance to make your best ...[text shortened]... ever you might deem as the most definitive passage that Jesus claimed to be God and you refused.[/b]
But I’m not going to argue about whether you have or haven’t. Anyone who’s interested can read the verses and passages and make up his or her own mind.
As you like to say, let Jesus’ words speak for themselves.
Originally posted by @romans1009And they'll see that:
That’s hardly all the evidence and you haven’t denied what’s there at all.
But I’m not going to argue about whether you have or haven’t. Anyone who’s interested can read the verses and passages and make up his or her own mind.
As you like to say, let Jesus’ words speak for themselves.
<<I even gave you a chance to make your best case with whatever you might deem as the most definitive passage that Jesus claimed to be God and you refused.>>
Originally posted by @thinkofoneI know you love to cherry pick, but the passages and verses of Jesus’ own words exist together.
And they'll see that:
<<I even gave you a chance to make your best case with whatever you might deem as the most definitive passage that Jesus claimed to be God and you refused.>>
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009And as you noted in the OP:
I know you love to cherry pick, but the passages and verses of Jesus’ own words exist together.
<< Some are fairly direct; others are interesting in their ambiguity.>>
As I've already pointed out: even there you acknowledged that at best it is only "fairly direct" and many are ambiguous.
As i'd also already pointed out: with the "son of God" and "one" with God claims don't hold water,
Originally posted by @thinkofoneI addressed your comments regarding my opening post in the thread you’re referencing.
And as you noted in the OP:
<< Some are fairly direct; others are interesting in their ambiguity.>>
As I've already pointed out: even there you acknowledged that at best it is only "fairly direct" and many are ambiguous.
As i'd also already pointed out: with the "son of God" and "one" with God claims don't hold water,
And, as I said and you have previously said, let Jesus’ words speak for themselves. I’m sure I’ll be posting more verses and passages in that thread in the near future.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThe irony is, you don't understand irony.
The irony here of course is that I’m not Romans, so you can’t convince me otherwise. This would be equivalent to you admitting that a lot of sane patients leave you convinced that they are mad thanks to you.
Whoosh!
Originally posted by @romans1009Mocking people with mental health issues now?
Ghost’s patients are more nuts when they leave a session with him than when they arrived
Nice.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeNo, mocking your abilities as a mental health professional. I have nothing but pity for your patients.
Mocking people with mental health issues now?
Nice.