Originally posted by @romans1009What do you know of my work as a mental health professional, spanning over 20 years?
No, mocking your abilities as a mental health professional. I have nothing but pity for your patients.
The answer you are looking for is 'nothing.'
And saying, 'Ghost’s patients are more nuts...' is absolutely mocking the people I work with on a daily basis, to manage their mental health issues and avoid hospital admissions.
You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself. (Seriously).
Originally posted by @romans1009For your interpretation to be correct, you would have to disregard these verses from earlier in the same epistle from John the Apostle.
I addressed your comments regarding my opening post in the thread you’re referencing.
And, as I said and you have previously said, let Jesus’ words speak for themselves. I’m sure I’ll be posting more verses and passages in that thread in the near future.
The fact of the matter is that I provided no interpretation. 1 John 3:4-10 is clear and unambiguous in what it says. It is consistent with 1 John 1:5-10. It is consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus during His ministry.
The gospel that you believe in is not consistent with 1 John 3:4-10. The gospel that you believe in is not consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus during His ministry.
You're dishonest in how you interact with people on this forum. You're dishonest with how you interpret scripture.
In this respect, it is not unlike the Old Testament in that God informed Jews of the Mosaic law, Jews could not keep it without error, and God allowed Jews to atone for their sins (failure to keep the law) by sacrificing animals.
The fact of the matter is that vicarious atonement was abrogated by God as revealed by the late OT prophets. That you refuse to acknowledge this fact is even more evidence of your dishonesty.
Are you able to cite verses to back that up? Because I believe God did away with repeated and what had become perfunctory sacrifice of animals to atone for sins by Jesus Christ’s one-time sacrifice.
I have. And you've participated on threads where I have. More dishonesty? What a surprise.
How else could you deny/ignore all the evidence for Jesus Christ’s divinity? You refuse to answer questions about it because your position is untenable.
I don't "ignore all the evidence". I refuted your so-called "evidence" on the "Jesus Identifies Himself As God" thread. It's there for all to see.
I even gave you a chance to make your best case with whatever you might deem as the most definitive passage that Jesus claimed to be God and you refused.
Your dishonesty continues...
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeBased on your behavior in here, I’d say my assessment was accurate. And didn’t you once say that in your capacity as a mental health professional, you didn’t see patients?
What do you know of my work as a mental health professional, spanning over 20 years?
The answer you are looking for is 'nothing.'
And saying, 'Ghost’s patients are more nuts...' is absolutely mocking the people I work with on a daily basis, to manage their mental health issues and avoid hospital admissions.
You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself. (Seriously).
Originally posted by @thinkofoneYou’ve gone from a serious, though misguided, person who liked to debate substance to a troll in a matter of days.
[b]For your interpretation to be correct, you would have to disregard these verses from earlier in the same epistle from John the Apostle.
The fact of the matter is that I provided no interpretation. 1 John 3:4-10 is clear and unambiguous in what it says. It is consistent with 1 John 1:5-10. It is consistent with the gospel preached by Jesus duri ...[text shortened]... efinitive passage that Jesus claimed to be God and you refused.
Your dishonesty continues...[/b]
That’s really sad.
I guess when you realized your “Jesus was only a man” position was a complete bust, you had two choices - accept that Christ was God in the flesh or start trolling. What a pity you chose the latter
Originally posted by @romans1009No, I didn't say that. Of course I see clients. That's my job.
Based on your behavior in here, I’d say my assessment was accurate. And didn’t you once say that in your capacity as a mental health professional, you didn’t see patients?
So no apology from you for labeling the people I work with as 'nuts?' Such labeling sits comfortably with you?
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009Your mocking of people with mental health issues is shameful.
Ghost’s patients are more nuts when they leave a session with him than when they arrived
Are you sure you're a Christian?!
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeWas referring to your “abilities” as a “mental health professional” based on your behavior in here.
No, I didn't say that. Of course I see clients. That's my job.
So no apology from you for labeling the people I work with as 'nuts?' Such labeling sits comfortably with you?
Do you think your colleagues would admire your behavior in here if they knew you were the Ghost poster? Or would they send you to the booby hatch?
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeOh don’t try to take the high road. You’ve never been there before and will probably get lost.
Your mocking of people with mental health issues is shameful.
Are you sure you're a Christian?!
Originally posted by @romans1009Again, are you too prideful to apologize for mocking people with mental health issues?
Oh don’t try to take the high road. You’ve never been there before and will probably get lost.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI was mocking you but I guess, on further reflection, I was mocking someone with a mental health issue.
Again, are you too prideful to apologize for mocking people with mental health issues?
Originally posted by @romans1009You don't consider calling the people I work with 'nuts' offensive or worthy of apology?
I was mocking you but I guess, on further reflection, I was mocking someone with a mental health issue.
And is mocking 'anyone' something a Christian should be doing?!
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeKeep going. See how many times you can type the same thing before they cart you off to the booby hatch.
You don't consider calling the people I work with 'nuts' offensive or worthy of apology?
And is mocking 'anyone' something a Christian should be doing?!
Originally posted by @romans1009You don't consider calling the people I work with 'nuts' offensive or worthy of apology?
Keep going. See how many times you can type the same thing before they cart you off to the booby hatch.
And is mocking 'anyone' something a Christian should be doing?!
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeKeep going...
You don't consider calling the people I work with 'nuts' offensive or worthy of apology?
And is mocking 'anyone' something a Christian should be doing?!
Originally posted by @romans1009You don't consider calling the people I work with 'nuts' offensive or worthy of apology?
Keep going...
And is mocking 'anyone' something a Christian should be doing?!