25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfConveniently for you he can't defend himself now so you can just continue to drag his name through the mud.
robbie carrobie was banned for cheating the Clans system ~ or for bad mouthing the website's owner after being punished for cheating ~ that's why he's not here to defend himself and to claim that I am lying about his attempts in the past to deflect criticism by comparing himself to Paul and to Jesus ~ Bible quotations and all.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell, he's gone now. Meanwhile, Romans1009 sought to deflect criticism by comparing his obnoxious childish trolling to Jesus speaking; he tried to hide behind a Bible quote. It doesn't need to be "lampooned".
Conveniently for you he can't defend himself now so you can just continue to drag his name through the mud.
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @fmfIf it doesn't need to be lampooned, why are you continuing to do so?
Well, he's gone now. Meanwhile, Romans1009 sought to deflect criticism by comparing his obnoxious childish trolling to Jesus speaking; he tried to hide behind a Bible quote. It doesn't need to be "lampooned".
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am not lampooning it. Do you think Romans1009 was justified in comparing his nasty behaviour to Jesus? If so, how?
If it doesn't need to be lampooned, why are you continuing to do so?
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am criticizing him. So, do you think he was justified in comparing his nasty behaviour to Jesus? If so, how would you justify it?
If you are not publicly criticizing Romans, what are you doing?
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI am not lying. I have not used using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm to criticize him. I have simply criticized him ~ and speculated whether he might be bringing Christians into disrepute deliberately.
So you were lying when you said you are not 'lampooning' it?
Originally posted by @fmfYou are using unkind words (ridicule) to publicly criticise him, i.e lampooning him.
I am not lying. I have not used using ridicule, irony, or sarcasm to criticize him. I have simply criticized him ~ and speculated whether he might be bringing Christians into disrepute deliberately.
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't think so. I am just criticizing him for his hypocrisy (unkind word) and sanctimoniousness (another unkind word) and his obnoxious (another unkind word perhaps) behaviour. So I am criticizing him in the ordinary sense of the word, and not "lampooning" him.
You are using unkind words (ridicule) to publicly criticise him, i.e lampooning him.
Originally posted by @fmfDo you believe that Dive is innocent of all the things you accuse Romans of?
I don't think so. I am just criticizing him for his hypocrisy (unkind word) and sanctimoniousness (another unkind word) and his obnoxious (another unkind word perhaps) behaviour. So I am criticizing him in the ordinary sense of the word, and not "lampooning" him.
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't think divegeester is a hypocritical or sanctimonious Christian at all - indeed quite the opposite... he frequently admits to being a 'bad' Christian - and one thing for sure is that as long as I have known him he has never tried to use the Holy Bible in a tawdry way, or tried to use comparisons of himself to Jesus, or use any kind of holier-than-though affectations, or tried to cite the Holy Spirit etc, etc. - to deflect from criticism of his own brand of banter. So, I don't think there is much mileage in comparing divegeester to Romans1009, no.
Do you believe that Dive is innocent of all the things you accuse Romans of?
Originally posted by @fmfWell since you and Dive are drinking buddies, I don't expect an unbiased evaluation from you.
I don't think divegeester is a hypocritical or sanctimonious Christian at all - indeed quite the opposite... he frequently admits to being a 'bad' Christian - and one thing for sure is that as long as I have known him he has never tried to use the Holy Bible in a tawdry way, or tried to use comparisons of himself to Jesus, or use any kind of holier-than-though ...[text shortened]... d of banter. So, I don't think there is much mileage in comparing divegeester to Romans1009, no.
25 Apr 18
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you agree with my evaluation, though, that's the thing?
Well since you and Dive are drinking buddies, I don't expect an unbiased evaluation from you.