1 edit
Originally posted by FMFBut I am not angry at all Effhim, is this another instance of you insidiously assigning fabricated values to other contributors that they do not hold? another instance of a willingness to believe nothing but your own propaganda? Oh dear, how so thoroughly telling! insidious and fabricated - a bad combination.
The reason for robbie carrobie's peculiar outburst of ad hominems and apparent anger on this page is most likely the reaction to him comparing himself to Paul here Thread 158762, page 3 onwards.
3 edits
Originally posted by FMFstream effhim? ad hominem effhim? impression effhim? I feel I have a moral duty to expose any sham operation and its tactics which presently amount to,
It's your stream of ad hominems that gives the impression.
1. Fabricating values that the proposer has not professed.
2. A tendency to believe nothing but ones own propaganda.
3. A failure to divorce the persona from the content of his or her posts.
Now you will note effhim, that these are issues within themselves and as such cannot be described as ad hominems for they do not seek for their validity to aim at your personally, but rather to address some moral issues.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYet when the rest of us expose your shenanigans as exactly this, you call it 'persecution'.
stream effhim? ad hominem effhim? impression effhim? I feel I have a moral duty to expose any sham operation and its tactics which presently amount to,
1. Fabricating values that the proposer has not professed.
2. A tendency to believe nothing but ones own propaganda.
3. A failure to divorce the persona from the content of his or her posts.
...[text shortened]... not seek for their validity to aim at your personally, but rather to address some moral issues.
Originally posted by FMFI don't feel trapped in a cul-de-sac at all. In fact quite the opposite.
Faith without doubt is a cul-de-sac for the human spirit. My experience is that my doubt led me to a better place, spiritually, than I had allowed myself to settle for. Doubt led me out of the cul-de-sac.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePeople can judge your Paul comparison thing for themselves.
stream effhim? ad hominem effhim? impression effhim? I feel I have a moral duty to expose any sham operation and its tactics which presently amount to,
1. Fabricating values that the proposer has not professed.
2. A tendency to believe nothing but ones own propaganda.
3. A failure to divorce the persona from the content of his or her posts.
...[text shortened]... not seek for their validity to aim at your personally, but rather to address some moral issues.
Originally posted by Great King RatI mean Nature as a whole. The balance of life. Only man threatens entire species with extinction, and often carries out that threat. We do this at our own peril. Nature also has an undivided faith that it can thrive if only it is allowed to follow its instinct. Man, of course, has a higher purpose, but we, too, should have an undivided faith that we can thrive if only allowed to follow God.
Any specific kind of nature? Female spiders often eat their male partners after mating, many predators catch their pray, hurt it so it can't escape and eat it as it is still alive and slowly dies a horribly painful death, and many male animals often fight until close to death just to decide who gets to mate with Suzianne. Any specific kind of nature we should try to emulate?
1 edit
Originally posted by Suziannethis is simply a fabrication in itself and highlights the matter at hand, you stated here and elsewhere that I claim to be persecuted, when infact i have claimed no such thing. If you can find any reference where i have stated that i am persecuted then please do so, otherwise what you assertion amounts to is exactly what i have been saying,
Yet when the rest of us expose your shenanigans as exactly this, you call it 'persecution'.
you believe nothing but your own propaganda and you fabricate values that other people do not profess.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFand you were asked countless times to produce evidence where i compared my behaviour with Paul's and you could not produce a single iota except values that you fabricated and references to your own propaganda, thank you for proving the matter at hand. It would be false for me to say that I couldn't have done it without you, because I could, so suffice to say thanks anyway.
I am fully accountable for my posts. They are all still there to see. I myself have provided the link and the page number.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs I said before, the evidence is your post comparing yourself to Paul, 6 posts down on page 3 of the "Jesus was married!:" thread. There is the evidence. People can decide for themselves. No attempt by me to hide anything. Fully accountable, as ever.
and you were asked countless times to produce evidence where i compared my behaviour with Paul's and you could not produce a single iota except values that you fabricated and references to your own propaganda, thank you for proving the matter at hand. It would be false for me to say that I couldn't have done it without you, because I could, so suffice to say thanks anyway.