Originally posted by robbie carrobie slobbering is simply a generic term and has no defacto meaning here, but if you would like to give it one by imposition as you usually do , then feel free, why change the habits of a lifetime?
"Generic" yes exactly my point to you "generalising" and stereotyping and then pretending you don't know what I'm talking about.
Originally posted by divegeester "Generic" yes exactly my point to you "generalising" and stereotyping and then pretending you don't know what I'm talking about.
have you anything of a spiritual nature to discuss or will you continue with your usual focus on personalities and an unswerving belief in your own propaganda? If not, the general forum awaits you-------------------> bon voyage, have a nice trip, send us a postcard etc etc
Originally posted by robbie carrobie have you anything of a spiritual nature to discuss or will you continue with your usual focus on personalities and an unswerving belief in your own propaganda? If not, the general forum awaits you-------------------> bon voyage, have a nice trip, send us a postcard etc etc
Maybe you should take note of your own advice from time to time. 🙂
Originally posted by robbie carrobie have you anything of a spiritual nature to discuss or will you continue with your usual focus on personalities and an unswerving belief in your own propaganda? If not, the general forum awaits you-------------------> bon voyage, have a nice trip, send us a postcard etc etc
You seem to love words like "slobbering" and "propaganda" when throwing insults at those you stereotype into one homogeneous out-group. I.e. Those people who disagree with you.
Originally posted by divegeester You seem to love words like "slobbering" and "propaganda" when throwing insults at those you stereotype into one homogeneous out-group. I.e. Those people who disagree with you.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie No my stance is not dependent upon any medical factors, its a religious stance, these other 'events' like the 3000 haemophiliacs are merely presented as questioning the safety of blood transfusions, but there is no dependency for even if they had not been given contaminated blood our stance remains, for its based on religious principles.
Then your religion is stupid and dangerous.
But I think I may have said that already somewhere.