1 edit
Originally posted by menace71Yes it was..... It was poated earlier but onjly a segment of it I believe. I'll look more to see if I can find the whole episode.
G-75 you can go to the web site and probably find the episode and everything. Post it as a link. Not that it proves anything in and of itself but then we can choose to see it.
You said it was Nat Geo ?
Manny
I was looking at evidence that the earth was at one point at a different inclination more than 23 degrees. like as much as 26 degrees or more even. It's from this site
which is a creation site
http://www.setterfield.org/Dodwell_Manuscript_1.html
Basically the belief is that the earth was struck by something or something cataclysmic
occurred and caused this.
Manny
3 edits
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/episode/2012-countdown-to-armageddon-4438/Videos#tab-Videos/07335_00
This is the one that was posted earlier. I'm still looking for the complete video.
Ok found it:
Make sure and go at least to the 43:20 mark.
I also want to say I do not endorse the Mayan's views that are shown here. They we a very paganistic and cruel society.
Originally posted by twhiteheadNo problem. This show is obviously more on the Mayans but this point of a very different event happening about or around the time of the Bibles flood to me is pretty important.
Thank you. I will see if I can watch it. Internet here in SA is expensive, but I do have a way to get youtube videos cheaply.
Originally posted by galveston75your post
Wrong? What?
from now on i reserve the right to support my claims with proofs and logic only when there is a new fundie on the block. one who hasn't yet established himself as someone who will never accept anything contradicting his view of what god wants.
for you and for robbie or rjhinds or whoever i will simply post "wrong" whenever you post extraordinary bull excrement.
it will save time. no longer will i have to post elaborate and often lengthy arguments like twhite and knob or hamilton continue to trouble themselves with. and you will no longer have to listen to yet another "godless sinner" telling you that god only wants your love, not to also be stupid.
Originally posted by ZahlanziOk..Whatever makes you happy!
your post
from now on i reserve the right to support my claims with proofs and logic only when there is a new fundie on the block. one who hasn't yet established himself as someone who will never accept anything contradicting his view of what god wants.
for you and for robbie or rjhinds or whoever i will simply post "wrong" whenever you post extraordi ...[text shortened]... another "godless sinner" telling you that god only wants your love, not to also be stupid.
Originally posted by ZahlanziYou are a funny guy, but not very convincing.
your post
from now on i reserve the right to support my claims with proofs and logic only when there is a new fundie on the block. one who hasn't yet established himself as someone who will never accept anything contradicting his view of what god wants.
for you and for robbie or rjhinds or whoever i will simply post "wrong" whenever you post extraordi ...[text shortened]... another "godless sinner" telling you that god only wants your love, not to also be stupid.
Originally posted by RJHindsIt was sarcasm. I know that, but you don't seem to know that by asking this question:
Wrong. Proper Knob claims to be an atheist but
does not agree with all other atheist on EVERYTHING.
"Isn't this what the atheist [sic] have been doing for years?"
As if all atheists agree with that particular point twhitehead was addressing.
Originally posted by lauseyI did not say all atheist. I was pointing out that the same thing
It was sarcasm. I know that, but you don't seem to know that by asking this question:
"Isn't this what the atheist [sic] have been doing for years?"
As if all atheists agree with that particular point twhitehead was addressing.
that he was critical of some creationist for doing had also been
the usual practice of the atheist when presenting their proof
for evolution.
Originally posted by RJHindsFor umpteenth time, evolution is not the sole domain of atheists. There are countless Christians, some who post on these boards, and numerous other religions who accept the evidence for evolution.
I did not say all atheist. I was pointing out that the same thing
that he was critical of some creationist for doing had also been
the usual practice of the atheist when presenting their proof
for evolution.