27 Nov '05 06:40>
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesUnacceptable legalistic reasoning.
You claim that the nature of the Church's notion of ordination is such that it cannot be revoked. The date that notion was accepted as official doctrine is the date at which the decision was made to keep this child molester a member of the clergy.
Please explain the following:
"Particularly interesting is the fact that the Church has decided to allow this wolf to remain a member of the clergy. Would anybody care to defend this decision? Perhaps there's a CRISIS magazine article that explains how this wolf was actually helping to improve the abused children's lot in life, possibly by filling the role of the missing father.
What exactly is it you are insinuating with the remarks about "how this wolf was actually helping to improve the abused children's lot in life"
Aren't you clearly and openly referring to a decision you mention in your preceding sentence which I explained could never have been made. You are surely not referring to the age old Churche's decrees on priest ordination here ? ... or are you ?