Originally posted by robbie carrobie No its not obvious,
It is obvious to me, and anyone who has actually studied evolution, that he doesn't know what he is talking about.
surely you must have made a comparison of what he has studied and what you have studied or are we to assume that your statement is based on nothing but your own arrogance and your ignorance of what he has studied. False dichotomy.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Where does he state that he does not want to learn anymore, is this another claim that you have arrogantly made without the slightest evidence?
I never said that about him, I said it about you. Read more carefully.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Oh its not all I've got me 'ol china cup, its only the beginning. Never the less I thank you for your encouragement, have posted a note on my monitor, must do better, Ghost of a Duke demands it!
Originally posted by twhitehead It is obvious to me, and anyone who has actually studied evolution, that he doesn't know what he is talking about.
[b]surely you must have made a comparison of what he has studied and what you have studied or are we to assume that your statement is based on nothing but your own arrogance and your ignorance of what he has studied. False dichotomy.[/b]
so your evidence amounts to, its obvious because i say its obvious, a logical fallacy in itself and no its not a false dichotomy because i do not present two opposing views as the only valid outcome (you once again demonstrate your ignorance of a false dichotomy) because you were simply asked for evidence of a claim that you have made and cannot substantiate with anything other than the hot air that arrogantly blows that balloon head of your around cyber space.
Here is your claim again, 'I know more about evolution than him.' Evidence? because its obvious. False, pretentious, unsubstantiated with anything other than your ignorance.
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke Put another note on your monitor:
'Twat.'
Oh dear, is that what you have been reduced to, calling people a twat, neither original nor very apt. Did i say that your posts are more a reflection of you than the people you seek to vilify, no? well now you are less stupid than you were prior to reading this post. Once again let it serve as a lesson to you. Neeeeeext arrogant airhead cyber balloonist, please show them in.
and why is that edifying? I know not a few persons who were witnesses and who became atheists after sometime, it happens. Its neither exceptional nor edifying.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Oh dear, is that what you have been reduced to, calling people twats, neither original nor very apt. Did i say that your posts are more a reflection of you than the people you seek to vilify, no? well now you are less stupid than you were prior to reading this post. Once again let it serve as a lesson to you. Neeeeeext, arrogant airhead cyber balloonist, please show them in.
You misunderstand me you old goat. It is not i calling you a twat. It was merely a suggestion for the next note to affix to your monitor, to remind yourself of your true essence. If twat troubles you, it can easily be replaced with pilchard or flipflop.
Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke You misunderstand me you old goat. It is not i calling you a twat. It was merely a suggestion for the next note to affix to your monitor, to remind yourself of your true essence. If twat troubles you, it can easily be replaced with pilchard or flipflop.
Why thankyou old bean, I'll put your name beside all three as a reminder.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie and why is that edifying? I know not a few persons who were witnesses and who became atheists after sometime, it happens. Its neither exceptional nor edifying.