From atheist to Witness of the Most High

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
As suspected twithead has arrogantly made claims that he cannot substantiate,

You wait five minutes and then announce I cannot substantiate my claims? Seems like you are in a bit of a rush. Nervous much?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No its not obvious,

It is obvious to me, and anyone who has actually studied evolution, that he doesn't know what he is talking about.

surely you must have made a comparison of what he has studied and what you have studied or are we to assume that your statement is based on nothing but your own arrogance and your ignorance of what he has studied.
False dichotomy.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Where does he state that he does not want to learn anymore, is this another claim that you have arrogantly made without the slightest evidence?

I never said that about him, I said it about you. Read more carefully.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
For your edification, here is an article by a former Jehovah's Witness turned atheist. 🙂

http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-03-on-jehovahs-witnesses-as-told-by-an-ex-jehovahs-witn

lol

Nice one.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Oh its not all I've got me 'ol china cup, its only the beginning. Never the less I thank you for your encouragement, have posted a note on my monitor, must do better, Ghost of a Duke demands it!

Put another note on your monitor:

'Twat.'

Originally posted by twhitehead
It is obvious to me, and anyone who has actually studied evolution, that he doesn't know what he is talking about.

[b]surely you must have made a comparison of what he has studied and what you have studied or are we to assume that your statement is based on nothing but your own arrogance and your ignorance of what he has studied.
False dichotomy.[/b]

so your evidence amounts to, its obvious because i say its obvious, a logical fallacy in itself and no its not a false dichotomy because i do not present two opposing views as the only valid outcome (you once again demonstrate your ignorance of a false dichotomy) because you were simply asked for evidence of a claim that you have made and cannot substantiate with anything other than the hot air that arrogantly blows that balloon head of your around cyber space.

Here is your claim again, 'I know more about evolution than him.' Evidence? because its obvious. False, pretentious, unsubstantiated with anything other than your ignorance.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Put another note on your monitor:

'Twat.'

Oh dear, is that what you have been reduced to, calling people a twat, neither original nor very apt. Did i say that your posts are more a reflection of you than the people you seek to vilify, no? well now you are less stupid than you were prior to reading this post. Once again let it serve as a lesson to you. Neeeeeext arrogant airhead cyber balloonist, please show them in.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
For your edification, here is an article by a former Jehovah's Witness turned atheist. 🙂

http://americanhumanist.org/HNN/details/2012-03-on-jehovahs-witnesses-as-told-by-an-ex-jehovahs-witn

and why is that edifying? I know not a few persons who were witnesses and who became atheists after sometime, it happens. Its neither exceptional nor edifying.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
lol

Nice one.

Wow next you'll be blowing smoke rings at each other in the shape of little love hearts. Spew.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Oh dear, is that what you have been reduced to, calling people twats, neither original nor very apt. Did i say that your posts are more a reflection of you than the people you seek to vilify, no? well now you are less stupid than you were prior to reading this post. Once again let it serve as a lesson to you. Neeeeeext, arrogant airhead cyber balloonist, please show them in.

You misunderstand me you old goat. It is not i calling you a twat. It was merely a suggestion for the next note to affix to your monitor, to remind yourself of your true essence. If twat troubles you, it can easily be replaced with pilchard or flipflop.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
You misunderstand me you old goat. It is not i calling you a twat. It was merely a suggestion for the next note to affix to your monitor, to remind yourself of your true essence. If twat troubles you, it can easily be replaced with pilchard or flipflop.

Why thankyou old bean, I'll put your name beside all three as a reminder.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
and why is that edifying? I know not a few persons who were witnesses and who became atheists after sometime, it happens. Its neither exceptional nor edifying.

Did you read the article?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Did you read the article?

No chance, why would i want to read about someone that was once a Witness and who is now no longer a Witness?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so your evidence amounts to, its obvious because i say its obvious,

No, I wasn't presenting evidence - merely stating it was obvious to me.

a logical fallacy in itself
Before you jump to labelling everything a logical fallacy, make sure you know what is being said.

and no its not a false dichotomy because i do not present two opposing views as the only valid outcome
You did try to.

Originally posted by twhitehead
No, I wasn't presenting evidence - merely stating it was obvious to me.

[b]a logical fallacy in itself
Before you jump to labelling everything a logical fallacy, make sure you know what is being said.

and no its not a false dichotomy because i do not present two opposing views as the only valid outcome
You did try to.[/b]

more emptiness