Originally posted by @fmfdj2becker, has the supposed "objective moral standard" of the religious text you like, in fact, left you hamstrung in terms of moral discourse?
For me, who else? One can only take moral responsibility for oneself, and for one's children while they are being raised, and for what laws with a moral dimension that one supports and which therefore affect others. You yourself have said, only recently, that you would not want to impose your morality on others. So,, on some level, you do realize that morality ...[text shortened]... t the execution of homosexuals, whether it be now (where it continues to happen) or in the past.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @fmfFor me it would be wrong now and in the past since I’m not a Jew.
For me, who else? One can only take moral responsibility for oneself, and for one's children while they are being raised, and for what laws with a moral dimension that one supports and which therefore affect others. You yourself have said, only recently, that you would not want to impose your morality on others. So,, on some level, you do realize that morality ...[text shortened]... t the execution of homosexuals, whether it be now (where it continues to happen) or in the past.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo you believe it was morally sound for Jews to kill gays?
For me it would wrong now and in the past since I’m not a Jew.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo your god figure required the Jews to do something that you believe was morally unsound?
For me it would wrong now and in the past since I’m not a Jew.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat other immoral things has your god figure asked his believers to do?
For me it would wrong now and in the past since I’m not a Jew.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhat!!!??? Forum gold!
For me it would be wrong now and in the past since I’m not a Jew.
This and your comment in the other thread about how time impacts morality completely blows everything you you have been saying about absolute universal morality, out of the water. It also shows that you really don’t hold to what you have been saying and are just trolling this forum, which is what every poster here knows and why you are so unpopular.
I would say, checkmate, game set and match.
Thank you.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
23 Nov 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterAt this point in time I live during the new covenant and I’m not a Jew living during during old covenant times. I have always maintained that the laws in Leviticus do not apply to us today because of the new covenant. Since you are only bothered with being popular rather than sticking with what the Bible says maybe you could clarify whether or not you believe the Laws in Leviticus were optional at the time and whether or not they still apply today.
What!!!??? Forum gold!
This and your comment in the other thread about how time impacts morality completely blows everything you you have been saying about absolute universal morality, out of the water. It also shows that you really don’t hold to what you have been saying and are just trolling this forum, which is what every poster here knows and why you are so unpopular.
I would say, checkmate, game set and match.
Thank you.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerAre you going to answer my three questions on this page? Please answer them with statements and not with questions.
At this point in time I live during the new covenant and I’m not a Jew living during during old covenant times. I have always maintained that the laws in Leviticus do not apply to us today because of the new covenant. Since you are only bothered with being popular rather than sticking with what the Bible says maybe you could clarify whether or not you believe the Laws in Leviticus were optional at the time and whether or not they still apply today.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou have indicated that you do believe it was morally sound for Jews to kill gays but you, on the other hand, do not think it was morally sound for Jews to kill gays.
The old covenant allowed it the new covenant doesn’t.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI think you'll find that it is what you said.
No, that’s not what I said.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI have answered every question of yours that I thought wasn't you just trolling.
I’ll answer them once you answer all the questions you are dodging.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you not realize how this has snapped the only string in your 'discourse on morality' fiddle?
For me it would be wrong now and in the past since I’m not a Jew.