Originally posted by scottishinnz
Why not base the religion in JRR Tolkien's Lord of the Rings then? If the veracity of the source cannot be trusted that surely undermines the entire edifice.
Religion is an institution that reminds us that there are things bigger than ourselves that are
worthy of respect and honor. In the revering of those things which are bigger than ourselves,
we should be inspired to virtue, self-improvement and integrity.
That is why some people can find the pursuit of scientific discovery to be a religious sort of
experience (I know I do). It puts us in touch with the universe -- either the very big, or
very small, the beauty in simplicity or in complexity, the awe of the power of fusion or
even the exceptional utility of water! It serves to humble and inspire. I hope that you
this kind of experience from the work that you do.
Can Islam inspire a person as I described above? Yes, of course it can! Can Christianity?
Yes. Can Judaism? Yes. Can secular humanism? Yes. Can JRR Tolkein? I suppose, yes.
The question is, does the historical veracity undermine the potential inspiration? I don't think
that it should. For example, do you think the story of Bambi suffers because it isn't historical?
Of course it doesn't: the triumph of the weak over the strong, the overcoming painful loss, the
role of friends -- all of these things can serve as inspiration.
The participation in that tradition which formed around a corpus of inspiration (historical or not)
can serve as a reminder for a person, to offer a constant source of metaphorical (if not historical)
virtue from which to draw. A person who doesn't respect the story of Jesus (even if that person
rejects His Divinity) I think is poorer for it. A person who doesn't respect the Koran or the
Talmud, I think is poorer for it. And so on.
Does that mean that one should accept every tenet of every tradition? No. Most traditions have
some sort of exclusivity clause, or at least the presumption of being God's chosen people. Does
that mean one should start going to
shabat on Saturday? Only if you hear 'God' speak to
you. If going bores you, or if you only go because you're scared you're going to make God angry,
then you're missing the point. A religious tradition is a vehicle for getting in touch with that which
is bigger than yourself. For some it works; for others it's silly pomp and circumstance.
And, so, you
could base a religion on the Simarilian, I suppose. If such a religion drove
people to virtue, then I'd be all for it. If it becomes a vehicle for siphoning power from the
masses to the elite, then I'd be against it. (This is why I am generally in favor of theologians
but not the theocracy, I might add.)
At least for me, historical veracity plays almost no role in my religious leanings. The symbolism
employed in the ritual, the significance of that which is articulated and gestured, that's what
brings me closer to God, helps me to remember humility, compassion, and a generous spirit. If
you can get that from JRRT, then you have my explicit blessing.
Nemesio