Originally posted by Dasa
The soul must be there in the womb at the very beginning if the baby is to be called living.
The baby is living at the moment of conception.
Vedic knowledge is true knowledge.
The soul must be there in the womb at the very beginning if the baby is to be called living.
Or to be called a 'baby', a 'person', or a 'life'. Yes, true, so far. You say 'If'.
The baby is living at the moment of conception.
False. The 'bundle of cells' may be alive, in the same way that any other 'bundle of cells' in your body is living, but it is not a 'baby', or a 'person', or a 'life'
yet.
Vedic knowledge is true knowledge.
All of man's knowledge, which the Vedas is sure to be a part of, is insubstantial when compared to the Word of God, which the Vedas is not.
One out of three, and that one only true on a technicality. Not bad, I suppose, considering the mountain of falseness that validates your thinking.