Originally posted by @suzianneHow is this in any way an answer to my point about there being a moral difference between torturing billions of people with no end and absolutely not torturing any of them? Labelling my point "mentally masturbatory" is just a deflection.
The integral problem with mentally masturbatory mind games is if your "ifs" are untrue, then your argument crumbles to dust, blown away with the wind, becoming as transitory and as substantial as the wind.
-Removed-There's a reason for that, a reason I've mentioned several times in this forum, as recently as a few days ago. If you'd pay even half as much attention to other people in this forum as you demand that we pay to you, then you'd know what that reason is.
That you spend sooooooo much time in this forum bitching about others' supposed moral lapses while ignoring your own, tells me everything I need to know and makes me even less inclined to talk to you than I already am.
Originally posted by @fmfThere is no valid answer to your point because your "point" is not valid.
How is this in any way an answer to my point about there being a moral difference between torturing billions of people with no end and absolutely not torturing any of them? Labelling my point "mentally masturbatory" is just a deflection.
Did I "dumb down" my answer enough for you or do you need something else, like a definition of every word I used?
FMF: How is this in any way an answer to my point about there being a moral difference between torturing billions of people with no end and absolutely not torturing any of them?sonship has spent perhaps 10,000 posts promoting 'torturing billions of people with no end' as being "perfect morality". Probably most of the active Christians here agree with him. You can't make that moral debate go away by telling me my point is "not valid" when I have simply reiterated what the disagreement between Christians is.
Originally posted by @suzianne
[b]There is no valid answer to your point because your "point" is not valid.