gods image

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
The Trinity refers to three distinct supernatural persons with identical attributes and different functions in the reconciliation of mankind: God the Father planned it; Jesus Christ the Son executed it [did the work]; God the Holy Spirit empowers it. Human beings are born dichotomous [body and soul]; at the second birth [regeneration by faith in Christ] ...[text shortened]... trichotomous being] which enables the believer to be taught absolute truth from the Word of God.

Jesus always spoke in a manner that invokes a learning experience. For the young christians they often take scripture at face value. As you grow and mature, the same scripture you had read before will also grow in you.

So when we read of the vine and the wine skins and many other subjects, what was read and studied the first time around, will mean something totally different the next time.

It is true too with the comprehention of "we are in the image of God" .
The concepts of God's image can be endless.

In this, that we are also a trinity, we experience it every day, and may never know it. As you are a 'Grampy' , Bob. You will see it within yourself. Our heart is like a child within. And when you play with your grandchildren, the child within comes out. When you are about doing business, taxes maybe or arguing a ticket with a cop, the part of you which has authority will make itself present. This is our soul. And finally the middle ground, our conscience, this is our mind.

Jesus unofficailly teaches us that we are a trinity when he states: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul and with all your mind." Matt 22:37

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, of course, photosynthesis is a process designed by God in plants to produce food and oxygen needed for the various life forms He was to create.

[b]Green plants are a beautiful part of Earth’s environment, and they are essential for life. God created them on the 3rd day of Creation Week (Genesis 1:10–13), before animals, and even before the sun. At th ...[text shortened]... othetical oxygen-free atmosphere required.

http://creation.com/green-power-photosynthesis[/b]

Dude, all you really needed to say, to stay relevant to our little discourse, is: Yes, of course.
Plants thrive on sunlight, and all other forms of life depend on plants one way or the other,
so the second law of thermodynamics doesn't in fact apply to our little world. Case closed.

You're just overdoing it, dude. You're just overdoing it. 🙄

back to gods image if he created joseph merrick god must be one ugly mother

Originally posted by C Hess
Dude, all you really needed to say, to stay relevant to our little discourse, is: Yes, of course.
Plants thrive on sunlight, and all other forms of life depend on plants one way or the other,
so the second law of thermodynamics doesn't in fact apply to our little world. Case closed.

You're just overdoing it, dude. You're just overdoing it. 🙄

Then I repeat:

The grass withers, the flower fades,
But the word of our God stands forever.

(Isaiah 40:8 NASB)

Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will not pass away.

(Matthew 24:35 NASB)

Originally posted by RJHinds
Then I repeat:

[b]The grass withers, the flower fades,
But the word of our God stands forever.

(Isaiah 40:8 NASB)

Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will not pass away.

(Matthew 24:35 NASB)[/b]

Yes, grass withers and flowers fades, but because of (essentially) cell-division, new grass
grows and flowers bloom. It's amazing what's going on. You can put that book down now.
I'm sure there's a biology book in the library you can borrow.

An observation: You're a poster boy for: "Creationism, because it's a lot easier to read one
book, than a bunch of hard ones".

Originally posted by C Hess
Yes, grass withers and flowers fades, but because of (essentially) cell-division, new grass
grows and flowers bloom. It's amazing what's going on. You can put that book down now.
I'm sure there's a biology book in the library you can borrow.

An observation: You're a poster boy for: "Creationism, because it's a lot easier to read one
book, than a bunch of hard ones".

That is one of the reasons the Second LAW of Thermodynamics is called a LAW and not a theory, like the theory of evolution.

Refuting Evolution in under 3 min

YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
That is one of the reasons the Second [b]LAW of Thermodynamics is called a LAW and not a theory, like the theory of evolution.

Refuting Evolution in under 3 min

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIm85YuplJ8[/b]

For any here who don't know, and are not as dense as hinds...

"A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes
some aspect of the world. A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and
implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_law

Whereas a Theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory is an explanation of facts and phenomena
INCLUDING Laws.

Hinds of course knows this as he has been told too many times to count.

But he likes lying about it because he has a totally unsupportable and stupid position.


Looks at video... Yep strawman attack, theistic crap as always.

Originally posted by RJHinds
That is one of the reasons the Second [b]LAW of Thermodynamics is called a LAW and not a theory, like the theory of evolution.

Refuting Evolution in under 3 min

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIm85YuplJ8[/b]

What googlefudge said in his/her excellent response.

For the record, having looked at the video, I'd just like to add that new genetic information
has been observed, contrary to what's being claimed in the video:

http://www.dailytech.com/Evolution+in+Escherichia+Coli+Bacterium+Observed+During+Lab+Tests/article12045.htm

Originally posted by C Hess
What googlefudge said in his/her excellent response.

For the record, having looked at the video, I'd just like to add that new genetic information
has been observed, contrary to what's being claimed in the video:

http://www.dailytech.com/Evolution+in+Escherichia+Coli+Bacterium+Observed+During+Lab+Tests/article12045.htm

They say there was a new gene not new genetic information. Anyway, Jerry Coyne is too stupid to pay attention to.

Originally posted by C Hess
What googlefudge said in his/her excellent response.

For the record, having looked at the video, I'd just like to add that new genetic information
has been observed, contrary to what's being claimed in the video:

http://www.dailytech.com/Evolution+in+Escherichia+Coli+Bacterium+Observed+During+Lab+Tests/article12045.htm

I'm generally regarded as being a him... Not least by me 😉

Originally posted by stellspalfie
damn it! ive been out geeked.

😀

Originally posted by Suzianne
😀

takes a special person to out geek stellspalfe he bought me the watchmen graphic novel it was rubbish Mr SI FI his mother calls him.

Originally posted by redbarons
takes a special person to out geek stellspalfe he bought me the watchmen graphic novel it was rubbish Mr SI FI his mother calls him.

ahem! 'loaned' mr barons, loaned you a copy of the watchmen.

Originally posted by redbarons
takes a special person to out geek stellspalfe he bought me the watchmen graphic novel it was rubbish Mr SI FI his mother calls him.

The watchmen are excellent, watch what you're calling rubbish, there, mister.

Originally posted by RJHinds
They say there was a new gene not new genetic information.

I don't know how I missed this response of yours, but you're wrong, as usual.

First of all, a new gene is new genetic information. In this case, it also happens to be
added information through a series of mutations, one of which is gene duplication:

The Cit+ trait originated in one clade by a tandem duplication that captured an aerobically-expressed promoter for the expression of a previously silent citrate transporter.

From: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461117/

That's new genetic information added to the DNA, observed by scientists.