gods image

Evolution verses Creation considerations:

Have you seen Trey Smith on The Theory of Everything - The evolution Test ? or Evolution: Modern Myth (100 ways to kill Darwinian Evolution)

YouTube

Originally posted by sonship
Evolution verses Creation considerations:

Have you seen Trey Smith on [b]The Theory of Everything - The evolution Test ? or Evolution: Modern Myth (100 ways to kill Darwinian Evolution)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gjvuwne0RrE[/b]

Originally posted by RJHinds
They say there was a new gene not new genetic information.

The Cit+ trait originated in one clade by a tandem duplication that captured an aerobically-expressed promoter for the expression of a previously silent citrate transporter.

Originally posted by C Hess
I don't know how I missed this response of yours, but you're wrong, as usual.

First of all, a new gene is new genetic information. In this case, it also happens to be
added information through a series of mutations, one of which is gene duplication:

[quote]The Cit+ trait originated in one clade by a [b]tandem duplication that captured an ...[text shortened]... etic information added to the DNA, observed by scientists.

bumped so you can't miss it[/b]

Originally posted by RJHinds
The information was USED, NOT NEW. Mutations are mistakes that destroys information or duplicates some information that provides no benefit.

Originally posted by C Hess
What the hell are you talking about? A gene was duplicated (an addition to the DNA as a
whole) and altered to serve a new purpose (new information). This equals a new gene;
[b]new information added to the original DNA, from at least fifteen thousand
generations earlier.[/b]

Originally posted by RJHinds
Not so. Can't happen naturally.

Originally posted by C Hess
But it did!!! Under scientific observation. Deal with it.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I didn't see it.

Originally posted by C Hess
Okay, I'm done with you.

YouTube

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, it is clear you did not want to learn anything about why evolution is so stupid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga33t0NI6Fk

Originally posted by C Hess
I watched until he says (paraphrasing): "we're gonna look at evolution, beginning with the creation of the universe".

{sigh}

Give me some real meat to chew on, will you? The only challenge in this one, was enduring the close-ups of his face.

Originally posted by Pudgenik
In another thread, and now here too. I have no problem with most parts of evolution. Say, the formation of continents, and land topography via glaciers and other sources. I have no problem with evolution of animals and plants. But at some point, God stepped in, and created mankind.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Evolutionists claim evolution does not bring about plants and animals.

Originally posted by sonship
Isn't that like a frightened ostrich shoving its head in the ground, so as not to see something ?

I sit through hours of "sigh" worthy brow beatings from defenders of Evolution. And you couldn't get pass the first few moments of the video ?

That's ostrich mode.