gods image

Originally posted by Pudgenik
What do you think 'being made in God's image' is? physical, spiritual, phycilogical?

We are able to judge of good and evil, as God is. It is the conscience which is an image of God, not the toe jam.

Originally posted by Pudgenik
I have no problem with most parts of evolution. Say, the formation of continents, and land topography...

? ! ? ! ?
You are just showing your ignorance and doing
a great disservice to more enlightened Christians.

Originally posted by Pudgenik
... I have no problem with most parts of evolution....

Yeah, right. I have no trouble with most parts of Christianity.

Originally posted by sonship
Isn't that like a frightened ostrich shoving its head in the ground, so as not to see something ?

.

No.
It's like seeing the first episode of a dire US
sitcom and not wanting to watch the whole box set.

Originally posted by Pudgenik
In another thread, and now here too. I have no problem with most parts of evolution. Say, the formation of continents, and land topography via glaciers and other sources. I have no problem with evolution of animals and plants. But at some point, God stepped in, and created mankind.

Leaving aside for the moment the "But at some point, God stepped in, and created
mankind." part of your post/position...

Evolution by natural selection is a theory Reveal Hidden Content that explains how you can get the present
variety and diversity of life starting from a single common ancestor.

Evolution says nothing about "the formation of continents, and land topography via
glaciers and other sources"... Those things would be covered by various theories in
geology and geography, and various other Earth sciences.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
No.
It's like seeing the first episode of a dire US
sitcom and not wanting to watch the whole box set.

No.
It's like seeing the first episode of a dire US
sitcom and not wanting to watch the whole box set.

It must be a better video than even I thought if it got that kind of reaction from you.

I think I should rate them by how fast you run away.

Originally posted by sonship
I think ....

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=54#comic

Originally posted by C Hess
Well, if I'm like an ostrich, then the ostrich must not bury his head out of fright, but because
he can smell BS coming. Any criticism against evolution that begins with how the universe
or life itself started is a waste of my time.

There would be nothing to criticize if one starts with the variations in the beaks of finches. Even Creationist believe in variations within species.

How about we start here?

YouTube

Originally posted by googlefudge
Leaving aside for the moment the "But at some point, God stepped in, and created
mankind." part of your post/position...

Evolution by natural selection is a theory [hidden] [an explanatory frame work, backed up with large amounts of evidence] [/hidden] that explains how you can get the present
variety and diversity of life starting from a single ...[text shortened]... uld be covered by various theories in
geology and geography, and various other Earth sciences.

Biologist Exposes Lie of "Overwhelming Evidence for Evolution¨

YouTube

Originally posted by redbarons
if we are all created in gods image why didn't he make a better job.

"in god's image" means "with god-like attributes". doesn't mean he made countless tiny gods, but humans that have reason, imagination, self-awareness.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
In God's image refers to the invisible, immaterial essence of mankind. The pattern God used was Himself: our essence also includes volition, self consciousness, conscience and mentality. Not a duplication of God but His shadow image. Genesis 1:26

If this so, then why, according to what you claimed in a post several days ago, did He make your viewpoint ~ that is, Grampy Bobby's ~ and His viewpoint, "diametrically opposite"? How could He model our "volition, self consciousness, conscience and mentality" using Himself as the "pattern" and yet end up with something that is, according to you, "diametrically opposite"?

Originally posted by sonship

It must be a better video than even I thought if it got that kind of reaction from you.

I think I should rate them by how fast you run away.

I was using a metaphor for CHess's response to your video.

I wouldn't waste a second on it.

If you could follow a discussion you would have realised that.