11 Aug 22
@divegeester said“Quoted for reference”
Which is … what FMF posted in his “three paragraphs” above which you in your usual MO, seem determined to completely ignore.
@kellyjay saidYou are now being passive-aggressive in a dj2becker style [...type it all out again for me FMF..."]. They are posts just a few pages ago, on this thread, addressed to you, responding explicitly to the things you were posting.
I'm willing to bet there are more than one of those, but if you cannot, either point
me to one specific or write out what you'd like me to address; oh well.
11 Aug 22
@fmf saidI am not going to play 20 questions accusations declarations with you to simply see something you say I missed. If you want point it out specifically repost your points, or give me the exact post location, or if you don’t care enough to do either, so be it.
You are now being passive-aggressive in a dj2becker style [...type it all out again for me FMF..."]. They are posts just a few pages ago, on this thread, addressed to you, responding explicitly to the things you were posting.
11 Aug 22
@kellyjay saidIf you want to read what my replies were to your posts and what my stances are, just go and read my replies to your posts where I put to you what my stances are. The exact location is over the past couple of days on THIS thread. If they are addressed to you and if part of your post is quoted, it's THEM.
I am not going to play 20 questions accusations declarations with you to simply see something you say I missed. If you want point it out specifically repost your points, or give me the exact post location, or if you don’t care enough to do either, so be it.
11 Aug 22
@fmf saidSo be it!
If you want to read what my replies were to your posts and what my stances are, just go and read my replies to your posts where I put to you what my stances are. The exact location is over the past couple of days on THIS thread. If they are addressed to you and if part of your post is quoted, it's THEM.