Guns????

Originally posted by RJHinds
Sure. But man can not guarantee such a thing will happen.

I didn't say it would and we all know that will not happen until God's kingdom takes over.

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Those who make comments like the following are exhibiting a paranoia rooted in fear.

The hidden agenda is to disarm the law abiding citizens. This is an invitation to Tyranny.
Throughout history, people were first disarmed, then enslaved.

In this case the fear of having to give up their guns in the face of the continued slaughte to mind those fearing a possible "mineshaft gap" with the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

We Christians must endure until Christ returns to rule the world. We would rather endure as free men instead of slaves to an evil tyrant. Therefore, we will fight, even with guns, for the right to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
We Christians must endure until Christ returns to rule the world. We would rather endure as free men instead of slaves to an evil tyrant. Therefore, we will fight, even with guns, for the right to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness. 😏

Yet more paranoia rooted in fear.

Originally posted by RJHinds
We Christians must endure until Christ returns to rule the world. We would rather endure as free men instead of slaves to an evil tyrant. Therefore, we will fight, even with guns, for the right to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness. 😏

Death to the tyrant!!!!

Death I say!!!

Who is this tyrant anyway?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
1940's germany had tighter gun laws than american currently does. i guess that makes hiltler a god damn hippie loving liberal!!




edit: it wouldnt be a proper rhp thread without somebody mentioning hiltler!

the political, social, economic circumstances were different. hitler didn't rise to power because he took away the people's guns. he rose to power because he had the support of the german people. they saw in him a saviour and allowed him to do whatever he pleased.

do you think the jews being sent to concentration camps couldn't get a bunch of guns together? do you think it would have mattered once the government comes crashing through their doorsteps?

Originally posted by RJHinds
Conservatives is American believe in the right and freedom for individuals to own guns. The left wing Liberals in America want to put restrictions on these rights. So I guess Conservatives are really more liberal by definition than the Liberals. Making laws restricting gun ownership in America has already proven not to work. The rules to prevent any typ ...[text shortened]... ren. All that could be done by the teachers was to throw their bodies in front of the children.

"Conservatives is American believe in the right and freedom for individuals to own guns."

but not the right of an individual to marry a person of the same gender. but not the right to recreational drugs proven to be less harmful than tobacco and alcohol. but not the right to healthcare. so no, you are not more liberal than liberals. you simply are a hypocrite, granting yourself the right to something you like, and denying other people what you hate.

"Making laws restricting gun ownership in America has already proven not to work."
even if it works in the european union, in canada. but then again, them weirdos don't know true freedom like americans do, isn't that right?

"It just made things worse because nobody at the school had a gun to defend the children"
yes, because if a psychopath wants to murder a classroom of children, the teacher is going to be clint eastwood and put a bullet between the psycho's eyes before he manages to even reach for his gun. we all know teachers are trained sharpshooters, with reflexes of a terminator and mind reading powers to identify the intentions of psychos.


this is the type of amerika you want? a crapsack wild west like in the movies?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
would you define all the right wing governments that have been in power in europe as 'liberals'??? ,maggie thatcher was no liberal, didnt see her demanding we all have the freedom to own bear arms.

giving the teacher guns will not stop people being killed in schools. the kids may get to see there teacher going down in a blaze of glory as their handgu ...[text shortened]... chool teacher carry guns.
how an earth you guys think we manage in europe with out guns?!?!

heh i approve this message.

only with a slight observation: he wants EVERYONE to have guns. as is their god given right.

citizens going to malls. mall security guards. shop owners. shoppers. a clint eastwood western.

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
heh i approve this message.

only with a slight observation: he wants EVERYONE to have guns. as is their god given right.

citizens going to malls. mall security guards. shop owners. shoppers. a clint eastwood western.

He wants the atheists to have guns?

Originally posted by RJHinds
I guess that is why my ancestors left Europe for American. But over here it is the left wing liberals that are the nut cases. They were even calling the police and sending children home from school and suspending them several days from school for bringing toy guns to school and other nonsense like that.

Over here, the bank without an armed guard is th ...[text shortened]... ipal to be armed.

P.S. However, it looks like it want be long before we will be like Europe.

However, it looks like it want be long before we will be like Europe.

If only. There is a certain disdain among some americans of anything european or canadian. or heaven forbid, french. what you and people thinking like you fail to realize is that the europeans are BETTER. you should aspire to be more like the french, or danes.

Originally posted by googlefudge
He wants the atheists to have guns?

if he doesn't, i will sell you some cheap with my christian card. but don't tell anyone

Originally posted by RJHinds
We Christians must endure until Christ returns to rule the world. We would rather endure as free men instead of slaves to an evil tyrant. Therefore, we will fight, even with guns, for the right to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness. 😏

Being a Christian has nothing to do with your view of guns and freedom. There is a very strong mixture of patriotism mixed in with your opinions.

-Removed-

That's what I like about you man,

You got such a way with words.

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
if he doesn't, i will sell you some cheap with my christian card. but don't tell anyone

There is a point I want to make referencing a fictional story but it needs a little introduction
to make sense. If you intend to read these at any point I warn that this will entail mild spoilers.



There is a trilogy of books by a Russian author (Sergei Lukyanenko) entitled:
"The Night Watch".
"The Day Watch".
And "The Twilight Watch".

(They have been made into a series of films... Which are (unlike the books) terrible.
And not particularly faithful/accurate to the books.)

They feature a "cold war" between the Light and the Dark "Others" who are people
who have entered the "Twilight" (sort of like extra dimensions) and have gained
magical powers and immortality. (The you wont die of old age, not the you're indestructible kind)
If you are happy/content/ect when you enter the twilight the first time you become
a Light Other.
If you are angry/sad/ect when you enter the twilight the first time you become a
Dark Other.

The Night and Day watches are made of Light and Dark Others respectively and they
police the activities of Others. Both overseen by the Inquisition who draw their members from both.

There is a truce because both sides (light and dark, overseen by the inquisition) had realised
that continuing to fight one another would lead to their mutual destruction, and so the watches keep the
peace (the treaty) and keep the others secret from everyone else.

A central feature of the stories is that (with a few exceptions for the undead dark others like
vampires and werewolves who are generally not very powerful) very few people have the
potential to become Others, Others can't be made, and Other abilities do not run in families.
So new others have to be found and recruited from the general populace.
And each side tries to identify potentials first so that they can point them in the direction of the
Light or the Dark.



However in the last book someone proposes a way of making anyone an Other, and making those already
Others more powerful.

One of the Characters asks another if they understand why that person is crazy and has to be stopped.

He responds...

"If all People become magicians ... Today they insult you on the trolley bus, tomorrow they'll incinerate you
on the spot. Today they scratch their neighbour's door with a nail if they don't like him, or write an anonymous
letter to the tax office, but tomorrow they'll hex him or suck all his blood out. A monkey on a motorbike is
only good in a circus, not on the city streets ... Especially if the monkey's got a machine gun."

"You think the monkeys are in the majority?"

"We're all monkeys."

Don't know what made me think of that for this thread...

Originally posted by googlefudge
There is a point I want to make referencing a fictional story but it needs a little introduction
to make sense. If you intend to read these at any point I warn that this will entail mild spoilers.



There is a trilogy of books by a Russian author (Sergei Lukyanenko) entitled:
"The Night Watch".
"The Day Watch".
And "The Twilight Watch".

[i]( ...[text shortened]... te]


Don't know what made me think of that for this thread...[/b]

You need to LIGHTEN up Mr. Fudge.

I think you need to get out more, into the LIGHT.


Just sayin'


🙂