03 Jul '06 04:52>
Originally posted by FreakyKBHwhich charge?
You didn't respond to the charge, I noticed.
Originally posted by KellyJay"We all view the universe with our limited knowledge and understanding."
We all view the universe with our limited knowledge and understanding.
We fill in the gaps of what we know with what we think is true, we can
work it out for ourselves, or trust another, but we are sill filling in the
blanks with faith and beliefs. It is still faith and beliefs in action, what
you want to place your faith in you may choose, but you are ...[text shortened]... hat the universe
should be like, and what we want out of it, and sometimes they
don't.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayHow do you know I have any faith in anything? you are making statments of fact about something you know nothing about. in this case whether or not I (or scientists in the wider context) have faith in anything. I do not use faith in anything. I do not have faith in anything. I do not fill in the blanks with faith. if you want to make a factual statement to the contrary then you must support it with evidence.
What you are putting faith into may be different, but you are still
using faith which comes from you.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJay"Originally posted by KellyJay
We all view the universe with our limited knowledge and understanding.
We fill in the gaps of what we know with what we think is true, we can
work it out for ourselves, or trust another, but we are sill filling in the
blanks with faith and beliefs. It is still faith and beliefs in action, what
you want to place your faith in you may choose, but you are ...[text shortened]... hat the universe
should be like, and what we want out of it, and sometimes they
don't.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayyou really dont have a clue about things KJ. Please dont quote 'scripture' at me , pretending there is equality of reliability between it and science.
We all view the universe with our limited knowledge and understanding.
We fill in the gaps of what we know with what we think is true, we can
work it out for ourselves, or trust another, but we are sill filling in the
blanks with faith and beliefs. It is still faith and beliefs in action, what
you want to place your faith in you may choose, but you are ...[text shortened]... hat the universe
should be like, and what we want out of it, and sometimes they
don't.
Kelly
Originally posted by googlefudgeIf Kelly would occassionally make coherent arguments we'd perhaps take him seriously. He tends to decide whether or not things occur on an arbitrary basis, rather than using any type of logical distinctions.
perhaps thats why he doesn't take you seriousely either?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHhttp://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=46760&page=1
As further testament to the unerring rightness of science, what a great week for those who hold unswervingly to limited understanding.
Introducing Nix and Hydra, two of (at least) three moons in Pluto's orbit--- previously held to be but one. Who says science can't be trusted?
Originally posted by scottishinnzI was trying to entice one out of him. Maybe I haven't been around long enough to give up hope.
If Kelly would occassionally make coherent arguments we'd perhaps take him seriously. He tends to decide whether or not things occur on an arbitrary basis, rather than using any type of logical distinctions.