Originally posted by @dj2beckerThat's just an ad hominem strawman.
Fabian claimed that no one knows God, that was his invention. If he has definitive proof he simply needs to present it and everyone will stop believing in God.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeBored by your trolling is all. You know better than that Ghost.
Sent to sleep by your own terminology.
Classic.
1 edit
Originally posted by @dj2beckerSo you have no evidence.
Evidence that is objectively true? Since when do you believe in objective truth?
Look, I never said there is no objective evidence for anything, and I never said that evidence here must be objective. You are just squirming from discomfort. As stupid as I am, you dj2becker deserve my disrespect.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerGhost is not a troll. Thank you for confirming my opinion about you, djbecker2 or whatever.
Bored by your trolling is all. You know better than that Ghost.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @apathistYou asked for evidence that can be demonstrated and doesn't depend on opinion. Surely all evidence for the supernatural depends on opinion else everyone would be a believer.
So you have no evidence.
Look, I never said there is no objective evidence for anything, and I never said that evidence here must be objective. You are just squirming from discomfort. As stupid as I am, you dj2becker deserve my disrespect.
2 edits
Originally posted by @fabianfnas
Faith, my friend, faith.
According to the christian dogma, faith is all you need.
Evidence? Bah! Faith!
Faith, my friend, faith.
According to the christian dogma, faith is all you need.
Evidence? Bah! Faith!
So ten thousand plus Jerusalem Jews began to switch from Saturday being their most holy day to "the Lord's Day", the 8th day of the week because of "faith".
To what do you attribute this sudden arrival of faith ?
Why didn't skeptics quench that faith by the presentation of proof that it was frivolous via producing the corpse of Jesus's body ?
There was plenty incentive to contradict the new faith from both religious and political power structures.
Do you have a decent alternative explanation of this evidence of the resurrection of Christ ?
2 edits
According to the christian dogma, faith is all you need.
No faith is not all you need. You need One to be FAITHFUL.
But aside from this quicky dodge, your next post I hope will give an alternative explanation to the switching of scores of Jerusalem Jews from Saturday Sabbath keeping, to "the breaking of bread" on the first day of the week, the so called "Lord's day" to celebrate His rising from the dead.
Why didn't those vehemently opposed to this new movement among Jerusalem Jews produce the corpse of Jesus to quell their enthusiasm ?
(Please don't just argue that I should have "faith" that you are thinking logically without your decent alternative interpretation of the evidence).
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWhy do you claim that nature (or even supernature, whatever that is) depends on opinion? The world, with all it's atoms and molecules doesn't slap you in the face, but I do. Am I supernatural?
You asked for evidence that can be demonstrated and doesn't depend on opinion. Surely all evidence for the supernatural depends on opinion else everyone would be a believer.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerBut I didn't shoulder that burden. Not that I couldn't, I merely did not. Your thought process is just a muddle.
Then you should have no problem demonstrating that my statement was indeed an'ad hominem strawman'. I'll get some popcorn.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @apathistSome people have the opinion that there is more than enough evidence for the existence of the supernatural, some people like yourself don't share that opinion.
Why do you claim that nature (or even supernature, whatever that is) depends on opinion? The world, with all it's atoms and molecules doesn't slap you in the face, but I do. Am I supernatural?