It's Better To Have Loved And Lost

Originally posted by @suzianne
Only you, pervert.

Not everything is about sex, you know.

Can you get your mind out of the gutter for two minutes, or however long you take to form a coherent thought?

Well people do not usually lose people they love other than sexual partners who move on.

Death perhaps but you don't really lose people to death.

Judging by D's response it isn't just me lol. You are such a loser.

Originally posted by @suzianne
Look, I understand that the only lens you have to see through is dark and distorted, but the basis for my argument is that the core of the Christian faith is love.

Therefore, when we deny love, we deny ourselves. I wasn't exactly talking to you except in that humans are made in the image of God, and at the core of God is love.

Love is the basis of t ...[text shortened]... regardless if you buy into it or not and regardless if you want to try to call it sexist or not.

Lol not love as you define it.

Originally posted by @eladar
Well people do not usually lose people they love other than sexual partners who move on.

Death perhaps but you don't really lose people to death.

Judging by D's response it isn't just me lol. You are such a loser.

You'll have to do far better than that if you want to pass Humans 101.

Originally posted by @eladar
Lol not love as you define it.

Please, tell me again what I think.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I owe you nothing.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

'Apparently'.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

What significance do you attach to Suzianne not indulging you and your repeated questions? Does it display her attitude towards genocide or does it display her attitude towards you?

Originally posted by @fmf
What significance do you attach to Suzianne not indulging you and your repeated questions? Does it display her attitude towards genocide or does it display her attitude towards you?

Same question can be asked of anyone who she refuses to answer including you lol.

Originally posted by @eladar
Same question can be asked of anyone who she refuses to answer including you lol.

Indeed it should. If I refuse to answer Duchess64's question about "genocide" of the Palestinians you should ask yourself whether it means I do support trying to exterminate the Palestinians [or as many as can be wiped out], or whether I don't know whether I support it or not, or whether I am not wishing to discuss it with Duchess64. My refusal - whether it be caused by an unwillingness or an inability to answer - would form part of the discourse and people should make of it what they will.

Originally posted by @fmf
Indeed it should. If I refuse to answer Duchess64's question about "genocide" of the Palestinians you should ask yourself whether it means I do support trying to exterminate the Palestinians [or as many as can be wiped out], or whether I don't know whether I support it or not, or whether I am not wishing to discuss it with Duchess64. My refusal - whether it be ...[text shortened]... bility to answer - would form part of the discourse and people should make of it what they will.

She is unwilling to answer any question that forces her to face reality.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

So, does her reaction to you display her attitude towards "genocide" or does it display her attitude towards you?