21 Oct '05 02:34>3 edits
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI'm sorry, but I have every right to be in the communal "kitchen" as anyone else. And if the heat is because someone has set an illegal "fire" in the kitchen, then I do not consider my leaving the kitchen the right thing to do.
Then you're missing out on at least half of the fun of the Spirituality forum! You Catholics need to learn to live a little.
My intention was not to chase anyone from the "kitchen" (as I've said, I've left a couple times myself for those reasons); certainly not to imply that you don't have a right here.
By "illegal" fire, do you mean something that violates the TOS--or do you just mean the kind of "arson" that you feel you have a duty and right to fight?
EDIT: Sorry, I missed your reference to the TOS. Do you really think that Savix's post violates the TOS?
"Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable."
Well, Howard's was perhaps "vulgar." "Otherwise objectionable" seems very much in the eye of the beholder. I wonder--when Darfius said that I was a servant of Satan, does that count? How about when someone says: "The only reason you won't accept Christ is because you want to keep living your sinful lifestyle," in a public post, as if they were privy to that person's lifestyle. I'm serious in these questions, not being sarcastic at all.