Jews end up in hell?

Originally posted by @chaney3
[Rajk999 is] a 'Christian' who feels that belief in Jesus is not required.

Have you debated Rajk999 on his understanding of the term "belief" and what he argues the phrase "belief in Jesus" means?

Originally posted by @fmf
Have you debated Rajk999 on his understanding of the term "belief" and what he argues the phrase "belief in Jesus" means?

Yes.

The belief in Jesus is not required. As long as one follows the commands of Jesus, then all is good. Atheist or Jew doesn't matter.

Originally posted by @chaney3
The belief in Jesus is not required.

What is Rajk999's understanding of the term "belief" in this context? What does he argue the phrase "belief in Jesus" means?

Originally posted by @chaney3
...this is an online website, in which an atheist has formed an alliance with a supposed Christian

What kinds of words and messages does someone who has "formed an alliance" post on an online debate and discussion forum that they wouldn't post if they hadn't "formed an alliance"?

Originally posted by @fmf
What is Rajk999's understanding of the term "belief" in this context? What does he argue the phrase "belief in Jesus" means?

Works......period.

Belief is not required.

Stop asking me questions. This is public knowledge from rajk999's posts.

Originally posted by @chaney3
Works......period.

Belief is not required.

I am asking you what Rajk999's understanding of the term "belief" is in this context. You just sidestepping the question over and over again indicates that you don't know.

Originally posted by @fmf
I am asking you what Rajk999's understanding of the term "belief" is in this context. You just sidestepping the question over and over again indicates that you don't know.

I gave you the answer.

Works.

Originally posted by @chaney3
I gave you the answer.

Works.

I am not asking you about what Rajk999 has said about "works". I am asking you about his understanding of the term "belief". It appears you do not know.

Originally posted by @fmf
I am not asking you about what Rajk999 has said about "works". I am asking you about his understanding of the term "belief". It appears you do not know.

I understand.

He says belief=works.

Jesus is not required.

Originally posted by @chaney3
He says belief=works.

Jesus is not required.

He has said an awful lot about Jesus and about what he did for mankind and the meaning of his life but I cannot remember him saying "Jesus is not required". Perhaps you can pull up a quote that proves me wrong. As far as I know, according to Rajk999, what Jesus did for mankind is the key to there being any chance of any human being "saved", as is following his commandments by living one's life as Jesus instructed humans to. If you have debated Rajk999 on this and extracted from him a statement that "Jesus is not required", then where and when did that happen?

Originally posted by @fmf
He has said an awful lot about Jesus and about what he did for mankind and the meaning of his life but I cannot remember him saying "Jesus is not required". Perhaps you can pull up a quote that proves me wrong. As far as I know, according to Rajk999, what Jesus did for mankind is the key to there being any chance of any human being "saved", as is following his ...[text shortened]... xtracted from him a statement that "Jesus is not required", then where and when did that happen?

Jesus is not required.
Rajk999's words.
Atheists can follow the words of Jesus.
No crucifixion necessary.
Good news for Ghost, which is why he likes him.

Originally posted by @chaney3
Rajk999's words.[...]
No crucifixion necessary.

When did Rajk999 say "No crucifixion necessary"? You say they are "Rajk999's words". Where are they?

Originally posted by @chaney3
Jesus is not required.
Rajk999's words.
Atheists can follow the words of Jesus.
No crucifixion necessary.
Good news for Ghost, which is why he likes him.

His ideology is that no belief in Jesus Christ is required.

Just cover your bases on one statement by Jesus about who will be found righteous and who won't.

Originally posted by @eladar
His ideology is that no belief in Jesus Christ is required.

But your ideology is that it is possible for Jews who do not believe Jesus was the messiah to be "saved", so how is that different?

Originally posted by @fmf
But your ideology is that it is possible for Jews who do not believe Jesus was the messiah to be "saved", so how is that different?

I think it is possible for those who have never hrard of Jesus, but that does not make it so.

Even in my very liberal view on the matter everyone here who does not claim Jesus is toast.