- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by @sonshipWhen he can’t handle the argument he attacks the person making the argument hoping that refutes the argument. Very immature behavior.
Here we go again.
Contact this these gentlemen / ladies and tell make a formal complaint.
[b]Schoettle Publishing CO. Inc publishers of books by Robert Govette. Send them a sample.
http://www.schoettlepublishing.com/
Put up .... or shut up. That's all.[/b]
Originally posted by @sonshipYou plagiarized someone who had made some kind of daft ghastly supernatural threat which appealed to your psyche and you needed to land a punch on a fellow Christian's chin in a hurry. You passed off the words as your own, sonship. I am lodging my complaint about it with you, not with someone in Italy.
Here we go again.
Contact this these gentlemen / ladies and tell make a formal complaint.
[b]Schoettle Publishing CO. Inc publishers of books by Robert Govette. Send them a sample.
http://www.schoettlepublishing.com/
Put up .... or shut up. That's all.[/b]
Originally posted by @dj2beckerDo you remember Dasa, the Hindu poster who said everybody not believing in Hinduism was dishonest ?
When he can’t handle the argument he attacks the person making the argument hoping that refutes the argument. Very immature behavior.
There is not too much difference between Dasa's fanatical dogmatism and the rampant suspicion of FMF.
Originally posted by @dj2becker to sonshipsonship's "argument" here is that he was falsely accused of plagiarism. It is an "argument" that I have no trouble whatsoever handling. He was not falsely accused of plagiarism.
When he can’t handle the argument he attacks the person making the argument hoping that refutes the argument.
Originally posted by @sonshipDasa wanted to exterminate all Muslim males.
Do you remember Dasa, the Hindu poster who said everybody not believing in Hinduism was dishonest ?
There is not too much difference between Dasa's fanatical dogmatism and the rampant suspicion of FMF.
You have certainly been dishonest about the issue of whether you plagiarized or not.
4 edits
Originally posted by @fmfCowardice disguised?
You plagiarized someone who had made some kind of daft ghastly supernatural threat which appealed to your psyche and you needed to land a punch on a fellow Christian's chin in a hurry. You passed off the words as your own, sonship. I am lodging my complaint about it with you, not with someone in Italy.
Oh, listen thanks again for the opportunity to do some free advertising. Now readers can have their curiosity stirred about actually great Christian books with much effective insight into the Bible.
It is hard to get writings like the quality of Govette in the last 50 years. Few Christian writers have such insight into the Scriptures.
The quality of Christian spiritual writings has declined, IMO, in the last 50 some years.
By all means readers. Don't waste time with me when you can sit down some week with a book by Robert Govette, Watchman Nee, Witnesss Lee and some others. Go for it! Please.
Anybody want to show why John 14:5,6 has been mishandled by my explanations on this thread ?
Anyone want to make an honest counter-view about anything I may have written?
You just might be right you know?
The big picture ... the big bird's eye view of the whole Bible is what I alluded to. Who can deny that the Bible's revelation ENDS with God's HOUSE, God's temple composed of saved human beings in Revelation 21 and 22 ?
Try it.
John 14 is handled here not as the milk of the word of God but more of the meat. Maybe it is too deep for some readers. But it is not wrong.
The place Christ went to prepare for His people is a "place" in the corporate salvation involving God living in man and man living in God.
Why not?
@FMF
You and your trolling pals will do anything to avoid debating the existence of God and the Bible.
But after the spanking y’all received when you did, I can hardly blame you. It’s a miracle you can sit down. Or are you on one of those inflatable rubber donuts?
Originally posted by @sonshipThanks for getting this thread back on track. Would like to answer this manana
Anybody want to show why [b]John 14:5,6 has been mishandled by my explanations on this thread ?
Anyone want to make an honest counter-view about anything I may have written?
You just might be right you know?
The big picture ... the big bird's eye view of the whole Bible is what I alluded to. Who can deny that the Bible's revelation ENDS wit ...[text shortened]... lace" in the corporate salvation involving God living in man and man living in God.
Why not?[/b]
Originally posted by @romans1009Sure Romans1009.
Thanks for getting this thread back on track. Would like to answer this manana
I think we can have some quality talk about it.
I may digest and respond tomorrow though.
Oh, I wish you'd read a few posts down into the thread thoroughly first.
Originally posted by @sonshipLet me first ask for a clarification. Are you suggesting God wholly lives (or will wholly live) in man?
What's wrong with this statement?
What is right with it then? Someone can agree too.John 14's whole discussion concerns Jesus going to DIE and RESURRECT from the dead to accomplish redeeming sinners and indwelling them for the purpose of building a living house where God lives in man.