Originally posted by @thinkofoneOnly saw your implication I was another poster after that first post of mine you referenced.
So originally you wrote this....:
"At the time I thought you did, but before I apologized for saying you did, I would first want to verify what you said is accurate, which I have not had time to do"
making it sound as if you were going to do so if only you had the time.
Now you've admitted that you weren't likely to do so in the first place.
[b ...[text shortened]... ns that you made a false accusation which apparently, you had no real intention of making right.
Your arms look tired from treading water and your chin’s going under, but hang on! I’ll throw you an anchor!
LOL
Originally posted by @fmfAnd let the trolling recommence!
But ThinkOfOne is right: there is another poster who does the same.
Originally posted by @romans1009You were referring to a post that I hadn't made yet?
Here’s the post I was referring to (on the previous page.) Kind of a waste of time to point it out, but I like to be thorough
Seriously?
Originally posted by @thinkofoneWhen I declined to apologize, it was after I saw the post where you implied I was someone else. I hadn’t seen that post previously.
You were referring to a post that I hadn't made yet?
Seriously?
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009Once again:
When I declined to apologize, it was after I saw the post where you implied I was someone else. I hadn’t seen that post previously.
"No matter what you make of my discussion with FMF, the fact remains that you made a false accusation which apparently, you had no real intention of making right."
It wasn't until after the false accusation that I took the accusation others were making at all seriously. Your behavior since then has only served to make it seem all the more likely.
Originally posted by @thinkofoneSo file a complaint with RHP and ask them to investigate.
Once again:
"No matter what you make of my discussion with FMF, the fact remains that you made a false accusation which apparently, you had no real intention of making right."
It wasn't until after the false accusation that I took the accusation others were making at all seriously. Your behavior since then has only served to make it seem all the more likely.
I suspect you won’t because falsely claiming I’m someone else is an important diversionary tool in your trolling toolbox.
Originally posted by @romans1009I mean we saw what happened to the fellow whose flawed reasoning re: the thief on the cross was exposed.
So file a complaint with RHP and ask them to investigate.
I suspect you won’t because falsely claiming I’m someone else is an important diversionary tool in your trolling toolbox.
Rather than immediately claim I am someone else (as you likely would have done) he flopped and flailed around like a fish on a dock.
Originally posted by @romans1009The person you seem to be like - uncannily so, as it happens - also uses the term "trolling toolbox", repeatedly. He also ends quite a lot of posts with the word: "Sad".
So file a complaint with RHP and ask them to investigate.
I suspect you won’t because falsely claiming I’m someone else is an important diversionary tool in your trolling toolbox.
Originally posted by @romans1009So file a complaint with RHP and ask them to investigate.
So file a complaint with RHP and ask them to investigate.
I suspect you won’t because falsely claiming I’m someone else is an important diversionary tool in your trolling toolbox.
It isn't an issue of filing a complaint. The issue is your lack of integrity.
Originally posted by @fmfLOL
The person you seem to be like - uncannily so, as it happens - also uses the term "trolling toolbox", repeatedly. He also ends quite a lot of posts with the word: "Sad".
Does he use all caps when he writes LOL?
I like “trolling toolbox” because it’s funny and I enjoy the alliteration.
And I started using “Sad” after reading tweets from our current president, though I usually include an exclamation point after it.
Originally posted by @thinkofonePresumably you’d like to stop it. The only reason you won’t file a complaint about it is you know you’re making a false accusation in an attempt to mask your inability to debate substance, just like your insults are false and used to distract from your inability to debate substance.
[b]So file a complaint with RHP and ask them to investigate.
It isn't an issue of filing a complaint. The issue is your lack of integrity.[/b]
But how would you troll without your diversionary tactics and lies?
Sad!
Originally posted by @romans1009The poster in question uses the term "diversionary tactics" too.
LOL
Does he use all caps when he writes LOL?
I like “trolling toolbox” because it’s funny and I enjoy the alliteration.
And I started using “Sad” after reading tweets from our current president, though I usually include an exclamation point after it.
1 edit
Originally posted by @romans1009Becker is a real buffoon. One of the biggest buffoons I can recall ever having posted on this forum. In fact one of the biggest buffoons I can recall having ever interacted with in all my life.
Presumably you’d like to stop it. The only reason you won’t file a complaint about it is you know you’re making a false accusation in an attempt to mask your inability to debate substance, just like your insults are false and used to distract from your inability to debate substance.
But how would you troll without your diversionary tactics and lies?
Sad!
Hate to say it, but your posts are becoming more and more becker-like. You should really consider whether or not that's the type of track record you want to have.
1 edit
Originally posted by @thinkofone to Romans1009I beg to differ. The account name "Romans1009" actually hit the ground running in terms of style/focus/gimmicks on page 34 of Thread 175422. 😉
Hate to say it, but your posts are becoming more and more becker-like.
Originally posted by @fmfI can only speak to my interactions with him.
I beg to differ. The account name "Romans1009" actually hit the ground running in terms of style/focus/gimmicks on page 34 of Thread 175422. 😉