JW's drop attempts to block sex abuse inquiry

The trouble with divegeester is he actually believes his own propaganda and takes his trolling seriously. I wonder if anyone else does? I don't. Why does divegeester hate Jehovah's Witnessses? Is it because they are out spreading the gospel helping others as best they can and it pains his conscience because he knows as a Christian he should be doing the same when infact his faith is all about himself and his personal salvation? this is the real question.

By the way PK I am reading a scholarly book on the secularisation of Britain and will have for you a fully working theory on why the UK has become overtly secular leading to a materialistic outlook. This is my second greatest opus since my treatise on Why atrocities occur (due to the suppression of the natural faculty of conscience)

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The silence of countless victims, how many? or can't you count them all? I want to hear you say it, how many? are we talking thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands? I repeat I want to hear you sat it.

It has also been pointed out to you that Jehovahs witnesses keep records of all acts that they deem as sexual misconduct, that includes ...[text shortened]... ught off many cases, so we shall ask you to produce your evidence, how many have we bought off.

Why and interestingly how did you get your post removed? Did you realise it was a crappy post and so edited it with a naught word so that robo-mod would remove it?

What naughty word did you write robbie? Galveston75 told me that Jehovah watches my every move...does he watch your every word also?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
By the way PK I am reading a scholarly book on the secularisation of Britain and will have for you a fully working theory on why the UK has become overtly secular leading to a materialistic outlook.

You mean you will plagiarise it...

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The silence of countless victims, how many? or can't you count them all? I want to hear you say it, how many? are we talking thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands? I repeat I want to hear you sat it.

It has also been pointed out to you that Jehovahs witnesses keep records of all acts that they deem as sexual misconduct, that includes ...[text shortened]... ught off many cases, so we shall ask you to produce your evidence, how many have we bought off.

Do you acknowledge, accept and welcome the findings of the Australian Royal Commission in so far as they form the basis for some serious criticisms of the JW organization in Australia?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The trouble with divegeester is he actually believes his own propaganda and takes his trolling seriously. I wonder if anyone else does? I don't. Why does divegeester hate Jehovah's Witnessses? Is it because they are out spreading the gospel helping others as best they can and it pains his conscience because he knows as a Christian he should be doin ...[text shortened]... hen infact his faith is all about himself and his personal salvation? this is the real question.

Are you once again talking to me but not actually talking to me just posting into a sort of white space and hoping I'll read it, while you are pretending to ignore me. You're such a twit.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The silence of countless victims, how many? or can't you count them all? I want to hear you say it, how many? are we talking thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands? I repeat I want to hear you sat it.

It has also been pointed out to you that Jehovahs witnesses keep records of all acts that they deem as sexual misconduct, that includes ...[text shortened]... ught off many cases, so we shall ask you to produce your evidence, how many have we bought off.

Seem rattled robbie. Deleting your own posts, rambling and ranting on...

If your organisation has nothing to hide, then why did they waste (waist) congregational given monies funding a legal battle to prevent a bonafide investigation into the sordid affair?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The silence of countless victims, how many? or can't you count them all? I want to hear you say it, how many? are we talking thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands? I repeat I want to hear you sat it.

It has also been pointed out to you that Jehovahs witnesses keep records of all acts that they deem as sexual misconduct, that includes ...[text shortened]... ught off many cases, so we shall ask you to produce your evidence, how many have we bought off.

So why is it you love being in a paedophile protecting organisation Robert? You missed that bit in your long winded word salad of an answer.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
So why is it you love being in a paedophile protecting organisation Robert? You missed that bit in your long winded word salad of an answer.

Why is it you love Islam PK, why does divegeester hate Jehovahs Witnesses and why is FMF a turnip, these are the real questions. 😵

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Why is it you love Islam PK, why does divegeester hate Jehovahs Witnesses and why is FMF a turnip, these are the real questions. 😵

Why aren't you at your church instead of wasting your time on this secular chess site?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
By the way PK I am reading a scholarly book on the secularisation of Britain and will have for you a fully working theory on why the UK has become overtly secular leading to a materialistic outlook. This is my second greatest opus since my treatise on Why atrocities occur (due to the suppression of the natural faculty of conscience)

Maybe you could look into why the Watchtower spent 2 years trying to block the UK Charity Commission conducting an investigation into its child protection procedures instead? Why do you think they did that?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Maybe you could look into why the Watchtower spent 2 years trying to block the UK Charity Commission conducting an investigation into its child protection procedures instead? Why do you think they did that?

On the contrary I have already provided details why the legal challenge was made. It is online and published by the UK government. If you don't understand why it was made then I suggest that you find out and who knows it may help you from making ignorant assertions in the future. You see I know why they did it. They were questioning a tribunals (which is a special type of court) legitimacy to hear the case and whether they could hear a specific type of evidence. The UK Court of Appeal ruled that a tribunal was the place to hear such cases but that it had no jurisdiction to hear a particular type of evidence. Now why don't you spare me the time and effort and research your subject prior to making these unfounded assertions, its very tedious battling against ignorance.

I will post this for the last time. Make sure you read it and assimilate it and don't give me no more of your wash in future.

The commission is pleased that the court unanimously dismissed Watch Tower’s challenge to the commission’s decision to open an inquiry. This is a significant decision allowing the commission’s inquiry to continue to progress. The challenge was dismissed because the court accepted the commission’s argument that the First-tier Tribunal (Charity) was the correct place to hear Watch Tower’s challenge to the inquiry opened by the commission. The commission believes that the specialist Tribunal is the right venue for such cases and is pleased that the Court of Appeal has confirmed this.

The commission is disappointed that the Court of Appeal found in favour of Watch Tower in one respect, deciding that the challenge to the commission’s Order seeking documents from the charity should be heard by the Administrative Court rather than the Tribunal. This decision was reached because of the specific wording of section 320 of the Charities Act 2011, which limits the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear challenges to such Orders. The commission continues to believe that the specialist Tribunal is the correct venue to hear such challenges. The commission has concerns that this judgment may cause confusion to charities and trustees wishing to challenge an Order under section 52 of the Charities Act 2011, as they will now need to work out whether the Administrative Court or the Charity Tribunal is the right place to bring the challenge.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/court-of-appeal-gives-judgment-in-court-case-by-jehovahs-witness-charity

Why do you still love Islam Proper Knob?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
On the contrary I have already provided details why the legal challenge was made. It is online and published by the UK government?

The link you provided needs amending as it's broken.

Nevertheless I went to the page and the page in no way provides details of why the JW organisation raised and continue to raise resistance to bonafide investigations into it practices. You are talking complete bollocks. If anything the page you have provided shows what a grotty little group your religious leaders are. Still continuing to resist investigation process. Whoever gave you that is not helping you Robbie.

Now, are you able to explain why you religious organisation has been misusing (in my opinion) congregational monies to fund lengthy legal resistance into the processes surrounding the reporting of 1000s of cases of alleged child sexual abuse within its ranks?