2 edits
The trouble with divegeester is he actually believes his own propaganda and takes his trolling seriously. I wonder if anyone else does? I don't. Why does divegeester hate Jehovah's Witnessses? Is it because they are out spreading the gospel helping others as best they can and it pains his conscience because he knows as a Christian he should be doing the same when infact his faith is all about himself and his personal salvation? this is the real question.
By the way PK I am reading a scholarly book on the secularisation of Britain and will have for you a fully working theory on why the UK has become overtly secular leading to a materialistic outlook. This is my second greatest opus since my treatise on Why atrocities occur (due to the suppression of the natural faculty of conscience)
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDo you acknowledge, accept and welcome the findings of the Australian Royal Commission in so far as they form the basis for some serious criticisms of the JW organization in Australia?
The silence of countless victims, how many? or can't you count them all? I want to hear you say it, how many? are we talking thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands? I repeat I want to hear you sat it.
It has also been pointed out to you that Jehovahs witnesses keep records of all acts that they deem as sexual misconduct, that includes ...[text shortened]... ught off many cases, so we shall ask you to produce your evidence, how many have we bought off.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo why is it you love being in a paedophile protecting organisation Robert? You missed that bit in your long winded word salad of an answer.
The silence of countless victims, how many? or can't you count them all? I want to hear you say it, how many? are we talking thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands? I repeat I want to hear you sat it.
It has also been pointed out to you that Jehovahs witnesses keep records of all acts that they deem as sexual misconduct, that includes ...[text shortened]... ught off many cases, so we shall ask you to produce your evidence, how many have we bought off.
4 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobWhy is it you love Islam PK, why does divegeester hate Jehovahs Witnesses and why is FMF a turnip, these are the real questions. 😵
So why is it you love being in a paedophile protecting organisation Robert? You missed that bit in your long winded word salad of an answer.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieMaybe you could look into why the Watchtower spent 2 years trying to block the UK Charity Commission conducting an investigation into its child protection procedures instead? Why do you think they did that?
By the way PK I am reading a scholarly book on the secularisation of Britain and will have for you a fully working theory on why the UK has become overtly secular leading to a materialistic outlook. This is my second greatest opus since my treatise on Why atrocities occur (due to the suppression of the natural faculty of conscience)
3 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobOn the contrary I have already provided details why the legal challenge was made. It is online and published by the UK government. If you don't understand why it was made then I suggest that you find out and who knows it may help you from making ignorant assertions in the future. You see I know why they did it. They were questioning a tribunals (which is a special type of court) legitimacy to hear the case and whether they could hear a specific type of evidence. The UK Court of Appeal ruled that a tribunal was the place to hear such cases but that it had no jurisdiction to hear a particular type of evidence. Now why don't you spare me the time and effort and research your subject prior to making these unfounded assertions, its very tedious battling against ignorance.
Maybe you could look into why the Watchtower spent 2 years trying to block the UK Charity Commission conducting an investigation into its child protection procedures instead? Why do you think they did that?
I will post this for the last time. Make sure you read it and assimilate it and don't give me no more of your wash in future.
The commission is pleased that the court unanimously dismissed Watch Tower’s challenge to the commission’s decision to open an inquiry. This is a significant decision allowing the commission’s inquiry to continue to progress. The challenge was dismissed because the court accepted the commission’s argument that the First-tier Tribunal (Charity) was the correct place to hear Watch Tower’s challenge to the inquiry opened by the commission. The commission believes that the specialist Tribunal is the right venue for such cases and is pleased that the Court of Appeal has confirmed this.
The commission is disappointed that the Court of Appeal found in favour of Watch Tower in one respect, deciding that the challenge to the commission’s Order seeking documents from the charity should be heard by the Administrative Court rather than the Tribunal. This decision was reached because of the specific wording of section 320 of the Charities Act 2011, which limits the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear challenges to such Orders. The commission continues to believe that the specialist Tribunal is the correct venue to hear such challenges. The commission has concerns that this judgment may cause confusion to charities and trustees wishing to challenge an Order under section 52 of the Charities Act 2011, as they will now need to work out whether the Administrative Court or the Charity Tribunal is the right place to bring the challenge.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/court-of-appeal-gives-judgment-in-court-case-by-jehovahs-witness-charity
Why do you still love Islam Proper Knob?