Logs in our own eyes

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
To be fair sir, you don't have much of a character to be assassinated. (Perhaps if you switched accounts less often and became more than a one trick pony? )

I do though gladly give apology to posters like Kelly if my comments ever cut a little too close to the bone. I agree with very little that he writes, but do not doubt his sincerity or genuine desire to discuss important issues.

How would you have known with certainty that I switched accounts if I didn't tell you? Also it was once off why are trying to make it sound like it's something done on a daily basis?

Originally posted by Rajk999
I dont even know why threads like these get started and its mostly by Christians .. they tend to be more insulting that atheists. First I have immunity against harsh words, so I dont care about that... so Lenunammi your apology for harsh words is not necessary. I notice other more subtle ways of insulting someone. That happens a lot around here and it is gen ...[text shortened]... w tries that tactic and he also uses insults as well and these are generally unprovoked insults.

So we good Raj?

Originally posted by leunammi
So we good Raj?

Yes, we are good, whatever that means. However you have have a poor attitude to people who are trying to understand what you post. Both Dive and myself saw this clearly recently.

If you post and people ask reasonable questions then you should answer. You have a problem doing this. Your poor attitude can easily lead to bringing out the worst in people rather than leading to solutions and consensus.

Your problem is that you disagree with the content of my post and this leads to your hostility and poor attitude to me. Rather it should lead you to discuss matters with me, but that is not the case.

Originally posted by dj2becker
So it's His fault if He has done everything possible for you to be saved and yet you are not willing to be saved?

Have you ever wondered why there is just peoples words on the subject. I think a real god would show up.

Originally posted by dj2becker
How would you have known with certainty that I switched accounts if I didn't tell you? Also it was once off why are trying to make it sound like it's something done on a daily basis?

You didn't tell me, that's the point. I carried on communicating with your new account with no knowledge of who you were. - Faced with such deception, I have no confidence in your claim that you haven't done this before.

Nothing you say is credible.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
You didn't tell me, that's the point. I carried on communicating with your new account with no knowledge of who you were. - Faced with such deception, I have no confidence in your claim that you haven't done this before.

Nothing you say is credible.

The point is if I didn't tell you you wouldn't have known. If the intention was to deceive I would not have told you. Period.

Originally posted by dj2becker
The point is if I didn't tell you you wouldn't have known. If the intention was to deceive I would not have told you, believe me.

You did not tell me. It was another forum regular who suspected you were the same person and sent me a PM.

Clearly you were getting your jollies by being deceptive.

Edit: And I notice you quickly edited your message just then to replace 'believe me' with 'period.' - 'Believe me' was a Freudian slip that indicated you are well versed in being deceptive.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
You did not tell me. It was another forum regular who suspected you were the same person and sent me a PM.

Clearly you were getting your jollies by being deceptive.

So his PM proved to you that I was using another account, or was it I that said I was using the other account. If I hadn't told you how would you have known for sure or proven it?

Originally posted by dj2becker
So his PM proved to you that I was using another account, or was it I that said I was using the other account. If I hadn't told you how would you have known for sure or proven it?

You 'admitting' you were using a second account is not the same as you 'telling' people that you were doing so.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
You 'admitting' you were using a second account is not the same as you 'telling' people that you were doing so.

But if my intention was to deceive I could have denied it right? If anything I was being honest.

Originally posted by dj2becker
But if my intention was to deceive I could have denied it right? If anything I was being honest.

Denying it would have indeed compounded the deception. That still doesn't excuse you from not volunteering what you had done and instead waiting for people to figure it out. How is that being honest?

In an earlier thread you apologised for not telling people. Was that apology dishonest?

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Denying it would have indeed compounded the deception. That still doesn't excuse you from not volunteering what you had done and instead waiting for people to figure it out. How is that being honest?

In an earlier thread you apologised for not telling people. Was that apology dishonest?

I apologized for not volunteering the information, it was an error in judgement. That said, why are you still going on and on about this if I did display honesty by admitting I used the other account? Do you not accept my apology for my error in judgement?

Originally posted by dj2becker
I apologized for not volunteering the information, it was an error in judgement. That said, why are you still going on and on about this if I did display honesty by admitting I used the other account? Do you not accept my apology for my error in judgement?

Which error of judgement? You have made so many...

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Which error of judgement? You have made so many...

And you have never made any? Correct?