1 edit
Originally posted by KellyJayI'll leave you alone Kelly with this thought. The few times you have felt it necessary to apologise to me in these forums, haven't I 'always' immediately accepted it?
I'll leave you alone with your thoughts on this one, if you want to forgive when asked you
can, if you refuse and think they must forever jump through hoops so be it. As far what
a fellow Christian can get away with, I'm not the one that makes that distinction between
others, when we do wrong! There isn't Christians and those that are not, who are doing ...[text shortened]... forgives when we turn to Him, He gives grace and
mercy when we repent and ask for forgiveness..
The reason being that I am in no doubt that your apology is genuine. - The exact opposite is true when FetchMyJunk apologises. For him it is merely another debating ploy.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by Ghost of a DukeIn your mind if I acknowledge that I used two accounts, something you would never have been able to prove if I had not told you, it means I am frequently misleading people. Ok, if you say so. Have you never made any mistakes?
Your apology in this thread is an acknowledgement that you frequently lied about misleading people. How are we to trust anything you say in the future?!
Originally posted by dj2beckerEverybody makes mistakes. But there is still some irony, is there not, surrounding you typing "Let him who has no sin throw the first stone"? You make the words sound a bit tawdry.
In your mind if I acknowledge that I used two accounts, something you would never have been able to prove if I had not told you, it means I am frequently misleading people. Ok, if you say so. Have you never made any mistakes?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFSo if Ghost has lied before which I'm sure he has, since everybody makes mistakes, why should I trust a word he says?
Everybody makes mistakes. But there is still some irony, is there not, surrounding you typing "Let him who has no sin throw the first stone"? You make the words sound a bit tawdry.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by FMFAnd I find it ironic that those who themselves are not perfect are judging other people as if they themselves are somehow superior.
Like I said, it is ironic that you should find yourself typing "Let him who has no sin throw the first stone" on this thread.
Originally posted by dj2beckerThis is exactly what I mean about you. You have been throwing stones at divegeester as long as I can remember [when you were posting with another account].
And I find it ironic that those who themselves are not perfect are judging other people as if they themselves are somehow superior.
The dispute about KellyJay's characterization of the debate regarding society intervening to protect children form parents who would let them die for want of medical treatment is real, relevant, and still running.
That you should see it as an opportunity to hurl a Bible verse at somebody involved in that dispute in a pious - and tawdry - way, reflects poorly on you.
As for me, I have never used the expression "Let him who has no sin throw the first stone" on this forum.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
Originally posted by FMFOf course in all of this you view divegeester to be the innocent one, is that correct?
This is exactly what I mean about you. You have been throwing stones at divegeester as long as I can remember [when you were posting with another account].
The dispute about KellyJay's characterization of the debate regarding society intervening to protect children form parents who would let them die for want of medical treatment is real, relevant, and still ...[text shortened]... , I have never used the expression "Let him who has no sin throw the first stone" on this forum.