13 Sep '17 20:50>
Originally posted by @sonshipWho are you now...Captian Jean Luc Packard?
Engage.
Originally posted by @eladarSubtlety escapes you in your headlong rush to call Jesus a bigot and justify your own bigotry.
He likened her and her people to a dog.
Originally posted by @eladarShe expressed faith and respect, which you apparently fail at.
She was simply willing to be called a dog. She was not being proud. She wanted a miracle and didn't care about being called a dog as long as she could get the miracle.
Originally posted by @suzianneThe truth escapes you.
Subtlety escapes you in your headlong rush to call Jesus a bigot and justify your own bigotry.
Originally posted by @suzianneI can understand how a child of Satan would believe I lack faith.
She expressed faith and respect, which you apparently fail at.
And Jesus recognized her faith. Would he have rewarded her if she only showed him insults, as you consistently do in this forum?
Originally posted by @eladarEveryone not a Jew was her people in the context of the story, you'd been a dog.
He likened her and her people to a dog.
Originally posted by @kellyjayYes, I would have been a dog bevause I am the wrong race.
Everyone not a Jew was her people in the context of the story, you'd been a dog.
Originally posted by @eladarWrong race until the work of God was complete. If you grasped what was going on you'd
Yes, I would have been a dog bevause I am the wrong race.
Originally posted by @kellyjayWhat is sinful is always sinful. If it wasn't sinful for Jesus then, it is not sinful today.
Wrong race until the work of God was complete. If you grasped what was going on you'd
stop this race bating of yours. God was out to save the world, He created a race to bring
Jesus into the world. He does not like or dislike one race of people over another, but He
did use the Jews to bring Jesus into the world to save the whole world.
Originally posted by @sonship
What is really the lesson being taught here as Jesus speaks to a Gentile women.
[b] " But He answered and said, It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the little dogs."
Originally posted by @eladarWhether you like it or not, the difference here is that what Jesus did was in no way sin, while what you continue to do and attempt to justify, with what you think is a loophole, is.
What is sinful is always sinful. If it wasn't sinful for Jesus then, it is not sinful today.
Jesus' fulfillment of the Law did not change the definition of sin.
Originally posted by @suzianneThat is correct, the racial slur was not a sin. This is because such comments are not inherently sinful.
Whether you like it or not, the difference here is that what Jesus did was in no way sin, while what you continue to do and attempt to justify, with what you think is a loophole, is.
Originally posted by @eladarWhether you like it or not, the difference here is that what Jesus did was in no way sin, while what you continue to do and attempt to justify, with what you think is a loophole, is.
That is correct, the racial slur was not a sin. This is because such comments are not inherently sinful.
Originally posted by @eladarWho claims anything that was sinful isn't? Again, you are seeing things not in front of you.
What is sinful is always sinful. If it wasn't sinful for Jesus then, it is not sinful today.
Jesus' fulfillment of the Law did not change the definition of sin.
Originally posted by @kellyjayDo you claim that Jesus wasn't being a racist when he told the woman she was of the wrong race?
Who claims anything that was sinful isn't? Again, you are seeing things not in front of you.