Matthew 27:52–53

Matthew 27:52–53

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
01 Feb 22

Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.


Are Christians obliged to believe and to assert that this really happened?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
01 Feb 22
5 edits

@FMF


Why not?

Which best describes your belief?

A. A Deist ?
B. An Agnostic Deist ?
C. An Agnostic Atheist ?
D. An Atheist Deist ?
E. An Agnostic Atheist Deist ?
F. An X Christian Agnostic Atheist Deist ?
G. All of the above?
H. None of the above?

Resident of Planet X

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28730
01 Feb 22
1 edit

@sonship said
@FMF


Why not?

Which best describes your belief?

A. A Deist ?
B. A Agnostic Deist ?
C. A Agnostic Atheist ?
D. A Atheist Deist ?
E. A Agnostic Atheist Deist ?
D. And X Christian Agnostic Atheist Deist ?
And yours:

A. Member of a cult
B. Member of a deification cult
C. A snake oil salesman
D. Lost and confused

Edit: Before your edit, you followed E with another D.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
01 Feb 22

@fmf said
Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.


Are Christians obliged to believe and to assert that this really happened?
Not for salvation, no.

Neither are they required to believe the creation account in Genesis for salvation.

Salvation is by Grace through faith in Christ Jesus a la John 3:16 and Romans 10:9.

But I think we bring a modern bias to ancient events, assuming news reporters and cameras and printing presses and telephones and all the trappings of modern society were available to people back then who witnessed miraculous events.

Obviously they weren’t.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
250471
01 Feb 22
1 edit

@fmf said
Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.


Are Christians obliged to believe and to assert that this really happened?
The basic requirement for entry into the Kingdom of God is this, and this alone ... Doing the good works Jesus described summarised as charitable brotherly love to those around.
.... Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. (Matthew 25:34-36 KJV)

The basic entry requirement for the Christians is a profession of faith, in Christ, and a life of righteousness. Christians are called to a higher standard than ordinary people.

No other knowledge of bible events is necessary and this can be proven by the simple fact that there was no bible for people to study in the time of the early church.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
01 Feb 22

@Ghost-of-a-Duke


And you:

A. The world's leading defender in what you don't believe?

B. A closet believer who can't stand to be identified as one?

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
01 Feb 22

@sonship said
Why not?
"They went into the holy city and appeared to many".

Where are the eyewitness accounts of at least some of these "many"?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
01 Feb 22

@rajk999 said
The basic requirement for entry into the Kingdom of God is this, and this alone ... Doing the good works Jesus described summarised as charitable brotherly love to those around.
[i] .... Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a ...[text shortened]... ated by the simple fact that there was no bible for people to study in the time of the early church.
The Old Testament didn’t exist at the time of the early church?

The last book of the Old Testament was written 500 years before Jesus Christ’s earthly ministry.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
01 Feb 22

@sonship said
Which best describes your belief?
I am an agnostic atheist. But I am interested in the historicity of Matthew 27:52–53. Is it MERELY because it's mentioned in one of the gospels that supposedly makes it a "historical fact"?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
01 Feb 22
1 edit

@rajk999 said
The basic requirement for entry into the Kingdom of God is this, and this alone ... Doing the good works Jesus described summarised as charitable brotherly love to those around.
[i] .... Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a ...[text shortened]... oven by the simple fact that there was no bible for people to study in the time of the early church.
The Holy Bible contains *numerous* examples of Jesus Christ referencing and quoting from the Old Testament. Here’s just one example.

“And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.

But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.

And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad?

And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days?

And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people:

And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him.

But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.

Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre;

And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive.

And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not.

Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:

Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?

And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.”

(Luke 24:15-27)

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
01 Feb 22

@fmf said
I am an agnostic atheist. But I am interested in the historicity of Matthew 27:52–53. Is it MERELY because it's mentioned in one of the gospels that supposedly makes it a "historical fact"?
I believe it was referenced in other ancient writings.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
01 Feb 22

@fmf said
Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.


Are Christians obliged to believe and to assert that this really happened?
Also, I believe the supernatural manifested itself much more often back then and while supernatural events would seem shocking to most people if they happened today, I don’t think that was the case back then.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
01 Feb 22

@pb1022 said
I believe it was referenced in other ancient writings.
Decades later after Matthew was written?

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
01 Feb 22
1 edit

@pb1022 said
Also, I believe the supernatural manifested itself much more often back then and while supernatural events would seem shocking to most people if they happened today, I don’t think that was the case back then.
What are your grounds for this bizarre belief?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
25 Nov 21
Moves
1990
01 Feb 22

@avalanchethecat said
What are your grounds for this bizarre belief?
What’s bizarre about it?