2 edits
Originally posted by FMFhere i my claim here,
So you are not claiming that block of text is a quotation from the book. Can you give an example of extensive quotations from the book on Thread 153415?
these arguments that i am presenting come essentially from a publication , Accuracy and bias in English translations of the new testament, written by associate professor Jason BeDhun
Its a claim that the ideas are from the book, for direct quotations will need to search, either way its apparent that i have read the book and you have not.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieHang on a minute. I am talking about this claim of yours from page 8: "I have read the book and quoted from it extensively in my discussions with R J Hinds, Jaywill and Suzzianne on doctrinal matters relating to translational bias." Can you give any examples of these extensive quotations?
here i my claim here,
these arguments that i am presenting come essentially from a publication , Accuracy and bias in English translations of the new testament, written by associate professor Jason BeDhun
Its a claim that the ideas are from the book, for direct quotations will need to search, either way its apparent that i have read the book and you have not.
Originally posted by FMFyou search for them if you like i have better things to do with my time, i have read the book, you have not.
Hang on a minute. I am talking about this claim of yours from page 8: "I have read the book and quoted from it extensively in my discussions with R J Hinds, Jaywill and Suzzianne on doctrinal matters relating to translational bias." Can you give any examples of these extensive quotations?
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou mentioned quoting the book extensively in the context of establishing and demonstrating that you had in fact read the book. But your claim that you quoted extensively on Thread 153415 is quite simply untrue.
fine but its clear that i have read the book and you have not.
J N Darby did translate the whole Bible - both Old and New Testament. In his Synopsis of the Bible I found this comment on John 8.
But here He presents Himself as the Witness, the Word, the Word made flesh, the Son of God, but still the Word, God Himself. In the narrative at the beginning of the chapter He is a testimony to the conscience, the Word that searches and convicts. Verse 18, He bears testimony with the Father. Verse 26, He declares in the world that which He has received of the Father, and as taught of God He has spoken. Moreover the Father was with Him. Verses 32, 33, the truth was known by His word, and the truth made them free. Verse 47, He spoke the words of God. Verse 51, His word, being kept, preserved from death. Verse 58, it was God Himself, the Jehovah whom the fathers knew, that spoke.
http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/john-darbys-synopsis-of-the-new-testament/john/john-8.html
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFNo thats a logical fallacy, simply because i have nor provided the references of extensive quotes does not mean that they do not exist, your assertion is infact unsubstantiated. either way i have read the book and you have not.
You mentioned quoting the book extensively in the context of establishing and demonstrating that you had in fact read the book. But your claim that you quoted extensively on Thread 153415 is quite simply untrue.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere are the "extensive quotes"? You offered a link to page 6 of that old thread when asked for an example of where you claimed you had "quoted from it extensively" but you were not telling the truth.
No thats a logical fallacy, simply because i have nor provided the references of extensive quotes does not mean that they do not exist, you assertion that is infact unsubstantiated.