Originally posted by robbie carrobierobbie: "I have read the book and quoted from it extensively in my discussions with R J Hinds, Jaywill and Suzzianne on doctrinal matters relating to translational bias. Is that truth an impediment to you answering the questions that were put to you since page four?"
I have just reproduced the claim that i made, it says nothing about limiting my replies to a single thread, you simply made it up, it also states nothing about thousands of anything, again you simply lyingly made it up, its what you do FMF because you are empty and devoid of anything of real substance. Its what we get when we engage with you, petty assertions of lying.
FMF: "Link please."
robbie: "http://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/new-world-translation.153415/page-6"
Originally posted by FMFthis was only a single instance, it was not claimed that it was exhaustive, was it? Oh no you simply made it up.
robbie: "I have read the book and quoted from it extensively in my discussions with R J Hinds, Jaywill and Suzzianne on doctrinal matters relating to translational bias. Is that truth an impediment to you answering the questions that were put to you since page four?"
FMF: "Link please."
robbie: "http://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/new-world-translation.153415/page-6"
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFI have made thousands of post have i not over the years? are you saying that I have not? I have not claimed that i have made thousands of post quoting from the book truth in translation, again you simply made that up.
You said "You search for the posts i am not searching through thousands of posts..." on page 12.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThere is not even one single "extensive quote" from BeDuhn's book on the thread. I'm afraid you've been caught fibbing, robbie.
this was only a single instance, it was not claimed that it was exhaustive, was it? Oh no you simply made it up.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNo, but you suggested I had "simply lyingly made up" something about thousands of posts, when it was in fact you who had referred to "thousands of posts", not me.
I have made thousands of post have i not over the years? are you saying that I have not?
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFLook I have nothing against you personally, but this pettiness is tedious, seriously. can you understand why people do not want to engage with you, it always ends up like this and quite frankly i have had enough of it. If you think I have deliberately misled you then its ok with me, if you think i am a liar then its also fine but i have provide three different threads where I have directly quoted the book in two of them and paraphrased the ideas in another, either way its clear that i have read the book.
And where do you think I've said anything of the sort?
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFthe link was provided to demonstrate that i read the book, i think any reasonable person can tell from that thread that i have read the book. If you like i shall rephrase my claim and state that i have extensively paraphrased ideas from the book.
Where are the "extensive quotes" you claimed there were?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere are the "extensive quotations" you talked about?
Look I have nothing against you personally, but this pettiness is tedious, seriously. can you understand why people do not want to engage with you, it always ends up like this and quite frankly i have had enough of it. If you think I have deliberately misled you then its ok with me, if you think i am a liar then its also fine but i have provide thr ...[text shortened]... wo of them and paraphrased the ideas in another, either way its clear that i have read the book.
