Originally posted by Agerg
My thinking on this matter is sound - there is no valid argument you can bring to bear that would render one supernatural thing any more plausible than another. Note: I don't accept logical fallacies as valid arguments!
As for you not accepting science (staying silent for now on your usage of computers which depends on a number of different disciplines) I p 'd reject!!!
But yeah...we should spare each other the pointless dialogue on this matter.
==================================
My thinking on this matter is sound - there is no valid argument you can bring to bear that would render one supernatural thing any more plausible than another. Note: I don't accept logical fallacies as valid arguments!
======================================
Disagree.
Santa with flying raindeers going down billions of chimneys on one night does not deserve the same serious consideration as the reported resurrection of an extraordinary man like history's Jesus Christ.
Sorry. Think what you want. Think argument ad populum.
The nature of the man whose words and deeds divided history into
B.C. and
A.D does not merit the same level of consideration as a fairy who puts a dime under the pillow of children when their tooth is placed there.
======================
As for you not accepting science (staying silent for now on your usage of computers which depends on a number of different disciplines) I pretty much take it as a given your science education is negligible,
================================
My bachelars was in Computer Science. I have written thousand or more computer programs.
And what I said was a comment on not rejecting all of science because attempts at turning metal to gold have not suceeded.
==============================
and would outright reject any claim that contradicted scripture.
==============================
Before you lecture me on the deficency of science education I would ask you, how many higher level computer language programs have you written ?
And I did not seriously say I rejected science. I made up a parody of a foolish generalization to illustrate how your logic sounds to me.
==================================
Indeed, In spite of how reasonable the basic assumptions, I'm sure if the mathematics which followed necessarily induced a contradiction with your religious beliefs then without a moments pause you'd throw out science - even though we can test science and the technology you rely on relies also on the truth of what you'd reject!!!
=================================
I think the laws of logic and mathematics come out of the mind of the Creator.
I think technology is really reading OUT of the creation the laws that Someone put there, learning them, channeling them for human usage.
I think the existence of technology indicates Divine Intelligence has designed the laws by which the universe runs.
I don't buy the "Blind Watchmaker" argument for a moment. And I think it is stupid to do so.