1. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    01 Nov '17 05:11
    Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
    I strongly disagree.

    In the main it does work .... at keeping people subdued and stupid.
    I'll let those type have their authority if they can first prove they deserve it, and we should all know that about half the cops just dont deserve it.

    Dont even get me started on pollies.
    Systems have faults, some more than others, but we (society collectively) give
    those mentioned "authority". It's the best we have got and far, far better than
    giving that authority to a theocracy with absolute "divine" power.
  2. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    01 Nov '17 07:08
    Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
    More importantly, can you ever tender a sentence that doesn't include the words objectivity and subjectivity?
    Yes, now are you going to answer the question you neatly sidestepped?
  3. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    01 Nov '17 07:09
    Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
    Humans are not objective. Even if there is an objective moral code, our ability to interpret is subject to our limitations [experiences, bias, etc.] and necessarily subjective.
    So you are saying even if rape was always wrong we wouldn't be able to know that?
  4. Joined
    01 Oct '04
    Moves
    12095
    01 Nov '17 07:12
    Originally posted by @apathist
    What? How did you get that?

    There is right and wrong. Which? depends on whether you are feeding or being eaten. This is what your god built.
    If what you believe is wrong contradicts what someone else believes is wrong and there is no way for you to establish which of you is correct then the terms right and wrong are really worthless.
  5. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102622
    01 Nov '17 07:23
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    Systems have faults, some more than others, but we (society collectively) give
    those mentioned "authority". It's the best we have got and far, far better than
    giving that authority to a theocracy with absolute "divine" power.
    Dont give authority to anyone unless you know they wont abuse their power ..
    "Systems have faults" ... Are you referring to capitalism? I would say that that whole system is wrong.
    It may have been right in the past however the inequality is rife at all levels. Why? Precisely because people give away their own authority. Instead of trusting the obvious parties, (family, friends, elders) , we just give all our money every week to the only 2 players in the game :Woolworths and Coles.
  6. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    01 Nov '17 08:06
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    So you are saying even if rape was always wrong we wouldn't be able to know that?
    Some of us wouldn't - the ones never taught to respect the wishes of others, or those that shirk the teaching and favor more of a 'might-makes-right' philosophy.
  7. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    01 Nov '17 09:02
    Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
    Dont give authority to anyone unless you know they wont abuse their power ..
    "Systems have faults" ... Are you referring to capitalism? I would say that that whole system is wrong.
    It may have been right in the past however the inequality is rife at all levels. Why? Precisely because people give away their own authority. Instead of trusting the obvi ...[text shortened]... , we just give all our money every week to the only 2 players in the game :Woolworths and Coles.
    This wasn't a political debate so I won't continue along that line.

    Who do you think has "authority" and how is it bestowed/taken?
    And is it better or worse than what djbecker suggests?
  8. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    01 Nov '17 09:04
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    So you are saying even if rape was always wrong we wouldn't be able to know that?
    Whether rape is right or wrong according to your god
    we know it is wrong.
  9. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157652
    01 Nov '17 09:27
    Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
    Listen to all points of view.


    The more generally inclusive, human(e) ,wholistic ideas are always more relevant than the divided and narrow views that theists have . They aren't 'better' but definitely more practical
    Better is a person preference unless you want to suggest that it is more. I'm willing to look
    at whatever standard you want to apply to everyone's standards to come up with what it is
    that everyone's views makes one's better than an another's.
  10. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157652
    01 Nov '17 09:28
    Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
    I strongly disagree.

    In the main it does work .... at keeping people subdued and stupid.
    I'll let those type have their authority if they can first prove they deserve it, and we should all know that about half the cops just dont deserve it.

    Dont even get me started on pollies.
    So you think it is something more than just human authority alone?
  11. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    01 Nov '17 17:07
    Originally posted by @dj2becker
    If what you believe is wrong contradicts what someone else believes is wrong and there is no way for you to establish which of you is correct then the terms right and wrong are really worthless.
    You say that either morality is objective or else it is worthless.

    Objective morality is for people who must be TOLD right from wrong. This isn't worthless; it is how we train children and constrain the mentally infirm.
  12. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102622
    01 Nov '17 23:46
    Originally posted by @wolfgang59
    This wasn't a political debate so I won't continue along that line.

    Who do you think has "authority" and how is it bestowed/taken?
    And is it better or worse than what djbecker suggests?
    Yeah I was just jumping around with that last post.


    When it comes to giving authority to 'the public' when it comes to social norms that make successful interactions then I'm all for it.

    If you dont take up the slack of responsibility after leaving the nest / if you dont develop your own sense of authority based on a sound evaluation of reality then you risk falling under the spell of countless shysters and snake oil salesmen.

    I'll comment on beckers' suggestions soon hopefully
  13. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102622
    01 Nov '17 23:49
    Originally posted by @kellyjay
    Better is a person preference unless you want to suggest that it is more. I'm willing to look
    at whatever standard you want to apply to everyone's standards to come up with what it is
    that everyone's views makes one's better than an another's.
    In fairness I believe other points of view to be equal to mine.
    I am not trying to reach any overall consensus, but I do try to find consensus on certain points of debate.
  14. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102622
    01 Nov '17 23:51
    Originally posted by @kellyjay
    So you think it is something more than just human authority alone?
    I think humans should take up the slack of responsibility and gain authority over the things they can control.
    Violence, environment, animal rights, gender equality ,etc.
  15. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    157652
    02 Nov '17 01:26
    Originally posted by @karoly-aczel
    I think humans should take up the slack of responsibility and gain authority over the things they can control.
    Violence, environment, animal rights, gender equality ,etc.
    Have you noticed that when humans do take up the slack of responsibility and game
    authority over the things they can control, they actually bring about violence, and many
    other nasty things.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree