1. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    10 Jan '12 19:30
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111219152508.htm

    Evolutionists 1, creationists 0.
  2. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    10 Jan '12 19:35
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111219152508.htm

    Evolutionists 1, creationists 0.
    Matt. 6:26

    Look at the birds of the air;

    God takes care of the animals.

    Creationist 777 and Evolutionist -666 for lying.
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    10 Jan '12 19:361 edit
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    Matt. 6:26

    Look at the birds of the air;

    God takes care of the animals.

    Creationist 777 and Evolutionist -666 for lying.
    I think it safe to say you didn't even read the article, just spouting the same propaganda you have been programmed to repeat.
  4. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    10 Jan '12 19:41
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I think it safe to say you didn't even read the article, just spouting the same propaganda you have been programmed to repeat.
    No it's true in some islands the becks of birds chance back and forth from each generation.
  5. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14251
    10 Jan '12 19:44
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    Matt. 6:26

    Look at the birds of the air;

    God takes care of the animals.

    Creationist 777 and Evolutionist -666 for lying.
    Well he doesn't take very good care of them does he? He's apparently put us in charge, and we've developed something of an aptitude for wiping them out...

    Incidentally, your maths is a bit out.
  6. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    10 Jan '12 20:38
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111219152508.htm

    Evolutionists 1, creationists 0.
    Have you not been reading my posts?

    Creationists don't score anything because they are not even in the game.

    Creationism isn't science and never will be even if it were right.

    There is no evidence that would contradict creationism and thus none that would support it.

    Also evolutionists isn't a word. there is no such thing.

    Evolution however is on about 20 billion by this point.
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12696
    11 Jan '12 01:17
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Have you not been reading my posts?

    Creationists don't score anything because they are not even in the game.

    Creationism isn't science and never will be even if it were right.

    There is no evidence that would contradict creationism and thus none that would support it.

    Also evolutionists isn't a word. there is no such thing.

    Evolution however is on about 20 billion by this point.
    Creationism is better than science for it is the word of God.
    In the beginning God create the heavens and the earth.
    (Genesis 1:1)
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    11 Jan '12 01:231 edit
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Have you not been reading my posts?

    Creationists don't score anything because they are not even in the game.

    Creationism isn't science and never will be even if it were right.

    There is no evidence that would contradict creationism and thus none that would support it.

    Also evolutionists isn't a word. there is no such thing.

    Evolution however is on about 20 billion by this point.
    I realize all that. My score just indicates one MORE point for evolution. Still zero for creationism, intelligent design, whatever the flavor of the week is now.

    My guess is neither of those creationist folk here have even read the piece, not wanting to be stained by the devil's work. What a way to live, eh.
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12696
    11 Jan '12 01:29
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I realize all that. My score just indicates one MORE point for evolution. Still zero for creationism, intelligent design, whatever the flavor of the week is now.

    My guess is neither of those creationist folk here have even read the piece, not wanting to be stained by the devil's work. What a way to live, eh.
    Sorry to burst your bibble, but you are not the score keeper and
    creation has already won. The score has not been recorded so all
    can see it yet. 😏
  10. Standard memberKellyJay
    Walk your Faith
    USA
    Joined
    24 May '04
    Moves
    148463
    11 Jan '12 01:311 edit
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111219152508.htm

    Evolutionists 1, creationists 0.
    Wow so several years after the flood it could happen where we get diverse life!
    Evolutionist 0, Creationist 1
    Kelly
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    11 Jan '12 05:45
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Sorry to burst your bibble, but you are not the score keeper and
    creation has already won. The score has not been recorded so all
    can see it yet. 😏
    So you are admitting you didn't read the devils article.
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12696
    11 Jan '12 06:47
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/12/111219152508.htm

    Evolutionists 1, creationists 0.
    This is just another example of adaptation. You guys keep confusing
    adaptation with evolution. There has never been one example of
    evolution yet. 😏
  13. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12696
    11 Jan '12 06:50
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I realize all that. My score just indicates one MORE point for evolution. Still zero for creationism, intelligent design, whatever the flavor of the week is now.

    My guess is neither of those creationist folk here have even read the piece, not wanting to be stained by the devil's work. What a way to live, eh.
    Don't you realize that this adaptaion would never have happened if the
    creator God and not designed it to allow for such change. 🙄
  14. Joined
    06 Aug '06
    Moves
    1945
    11 Jan '12 10:12
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    This is just another example of adaptation. You guys keep confusing
    adaptation with evolution. There has never been one example of
    evolution yet. 😏
    You're making pretty arbitrary distinctions aren't you ?
  15. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    35531
    11 Jan '12 10:19
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Creationism is better than science for it is the word of God.
    In the beginning God create the heavens and the earth.
    (Genesis 1:1)
    Why do you constrain God so?

    He has much more to work with than just snapping His fingers and poof, things appear. He's not a stage magician.
Back to Top