@josephw saidExcellent post.
Only the weak in spirit hold grudges. Like divegeester said, I like yours and others posts, even though I may vehemently disagree with what you say.
I especially take umbrage at the distorting and twisting of things I infer by what I say to be made to mean something other than what I said.
For example, your inference that I would "leap to the defense" of a malicious tro ...[text shortened]... exhibit symptoms of confirmation bias when you do that, as well as an online disinhibition syndrome.
@fmf saidPrinciple is not exactly your strong suit and josephw appears to be the only regular poster who’s not accepting what you guys claim is fact based only on your say-so.
You have exhibited almost zero principle over the last couple of pages.
You claim that Roman guy trolled dive over the death of his mother and that you have the thread to prove it.
And yet you refuse to post that thread, despite my pleas for you to post it.
You claim that Roman guy posted “hundreds and hundreds” of comments about adults having sex with a child and can’t produce a single one.
You’re a lying, malicious troll, FMF.
@fmf saidI explained that already - several times.
He has already acknowledged that he was Romans1009. But now he has backpeddled and wants to play to the peanut gallery instead. You are in the peanut gallery.
I was here in 2018 and witnessed everything you guys have been talking about.
When I returned to the site, I thought it’d be funny to call dive “tiger,” not realizing he’d get so angry and upset and accuse me of being that Roman guy.
Since I found his fury over something that happened four years ago to be funny, I (in hindsight mistakenly) continued the gag.
I didn’t realize you guys were still so po’d at that Roman guy getting the best of you four years ago and nearly driving dive into the loony bin.
@fmf saiddive has already said - publicly and repeatedly - that he can get anyone banned from this site that he wants. What happened to that Roman guy is clearly an example of that.
The website banned him. Not me. The website had all the evidence it needed.
In defense of dive, Roman trolled dive so hard and turned him into such an emotional and nervous wreck, I think most people would understand dive wanting him banned and still obsessing over him four years later.
@josephw saidAmen
Nonsense. Your problem is you're too over confident in your self justifying rhetoric.
We share the same basic moral and ethical principles in general, but we have differing belief systems that motivate our expressions of those principals.
But you insist on labeling, inferring and characterizing what others say that is fundamentally and diametrically opposed to your worl ...[text shortened]... opponents into the mold you shape for them.
It's childish, immature and intellectually dishonest.
1 edit
@pb1022 saidYou trolled people in a variety of different and abhorrent ways. (That eventually led to you being banned from the site).
Can’t keep your lies straight?
P.S You better stress here you are speaking hypothetically, as why would you care about what Romans said if you're not him?
I bet you're rubbish at Cluedo.
@pb1022 saidYou do realize that the mods are already fully aware you are Romans1009?
You, dive and Ghost are simply gang trolling me - just like you did to that Roman guy in 2018 until he turned the tables on you and beat you at your own game.
dive was so traumatized by that Roman guy’s trolling he nearly had a nervous breakdown, while you and Ghost were busy playing the victim and trying to get that Roman guy banned.
It was a very sorry chapter in the l ...[text shortened]... of you into a near nervous breakdown and had the other two screaming “Uncle!” and begging for mercy.
You know that right?
@josephw saidWhile FMF is at it, ask him to produce a single post - from the “hundreds and hundreds” he claims exist - of that Roman guy’s comments about adults having sex with a child.
Has he? I guess I missed that post. Can you provide the quote?
Ask him to post the thread - which he says he has - of that Roman guy trolling dive over the death of his mother.
As for your actual request to FMF, I’ve already explained that several times, as recently as about 20 minutes ago.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWrong on all three.
Joseph, I had (many) long conversations with him here (in this forum) about posts he made as Romans. He spoke in the first person about these posts in his attempts to justify them. Suzianne even asked him directly and he admitted he was Romans. It is only now he realizes that linking himself with a banned account was a poor decision and is trying to (bizarrely) row ba ...[text shortened]... RHP records.
2. PB has made abundantly clear he is Romans.
3, A leopard doesn't change its spots.
1) dive has said publicly and repeatedly he can get anyone banned from this site that he wants banned. What happened to Roman is clearly an example of that - dive got out-trolled and nearly had a breakdown.
2) I already explained that, most recently about 20 minutes ago. Not going to keep saying the same thing over and over.
3) “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.”
(2 Corinthians 5:17)