Go back
Motivation of Atheists and Christ Deniers?

Motivation of Atheists and Christ Deniers?

Spirituality



@plantermoo said
I believe the creation account in Genesis on faith. Science isn’t advanced enough to test it.
Science has advanced enough to say humanity didn't spring to life in a garden.

Catch up.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Well, duh.

Such evolution takes place over millions of years. If we are only going to believe things that occurred last Tuesday how are we to believe anything?
I’m fully aware why Darwin couldn’t observe his central hypothesis. My only point is that his theory doesn’t follow the Scientific Method.

And decades-long experiments that tried to prove speciation with bacteria and fruit flies, which have short generational spans, have failed.

1 edit


@plantermoo said
I believe the creation account in Genesis on faith. Science isn’t advanced enough to test it.
It's plain weird that you dismiss tangible evidence from science and yet readily embrace obvious myths as fact.



-Removed-
How many dimensions are there?

What’s dark matter and dark energy? We don’t know what 96 percent of the universe is made of.

Do wormholes in space exist? What about white holes?

Was time created? Can it be manipulated, and, if so, to what extent?

These are just some of the questions current science can’t answer.

Trying to use current science to test the creation account is like trying to use numbered blocks to solve a calculus problem.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
It's plain weird that you dismiss tangible evidence from science and yet readily embrace obvious myths as fact.
What evidence? An unknown number of disputed transitional fossils? A similar genetic makeup among animals and among humans and animals?


@plantermoo said
How many dimensions are there?

What’s dark matter and dark energy? We don’t know what 96 percent of the universe is made of.

Do wormholes in space exist? What about white holes?

Was time created? Can it be manipulated, and, if so, to what extent?

These are just some of the questions current science can’t answer.

Trying to use current science to test the creation account is like trying to use numbered blocks to solve a calculus problem.
You are holding us back as a species. Evolve already.



@plantermoo said
What evidence? An unknown number of disputed transitional fossils? A similar genetic makeup among animals and among humans and animals?
You keep banging on about transitional fossils with no apparent awareness of molecular biology or biogeography.

It's like communicating with Lego.



-Removed-
Hilarious, but depressing.


@plantermoo said
I’m flattered
She didn't flatter you, she flattened you.


@plantermoo said
What evidence? An unknown number of disputed transitional fossils? A similar genetic makeup among animals and among humans and animals?
And all because they eat the same food; incredible, isn't it?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.