NZ gay marriage act

Originally posted by stellspalfie
wasnt me calling him a homosexual, rj.

I guess you are the innocent one.

-Removed-

as it was explained to FMF, it was hyperbole, now stop being such a bore and realise the fact.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I guess you are the innocent one.

innocent until proven guilty my logically challenged friend.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
as it was explained to FMF, it was hyperbole, now stop being such a bore and realise the fact.

hyperbole doesnt take away the meaning. its used to exaggerated meaning.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
hyperbole doesnt take away the meaning. its used to exaggerated meaning.

you don't say. . . .

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you don't say. . . .

..............so the fact that it was hyperbole is irrelevant.

-Removed-

yeah yeay thats rights, I am justifying my alleged lust for painting by accusing Christ of hyperbole. If you dont mind I think I'll ignore the lunacy.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
..............so the fact that it was hyperbole is irrelevant.

hardly.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hardly.

hardly, why? you know ive nailed you on this. you know why hyperbole or not makes no difference to the meaning and context, why make this difficult? you seemed to be taking several steps forward with your apology earlier, now its back to same old robbie.


you tell me how the meaning of your reply was relevant to the implication you were homosexual and ill hold my hands up. your brother in faith galvy has hit me with a few pure answers today that i had to respect, can you do the same?

Originally posted by stellspalfie
hardly, why? you know ive nailed you on this. you know why hyperbole or not makes no difference to the meaning and context, why make this difficult? you seemed to be taking several steps forward with your apology earlier, now its back to same old robbie.


you tell me how the meaning of your reply was relevant to the implication you were homosexual a ...[text shortened]... faith galvy has hit me with a few pure answers today that i had to respect, can you do the same?

you dont know anything you zoob, hyperbole may be so exaggerated as to be literally impossible in reality, for example, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of the heavens.

As for the question, even R Jonah Hinds answered that, but it was too sensible for you to grasp, seemingly. Ill repeat it again, perhaps instead of reverberating against the side of your head, it may penetrate,

'The relevance is clear to all but the insane or Satan crazed. He is obviously relating that he is strongly heterosexual in response to your homosexual urging.'

Thankyou R Jonah Hinds.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you dont know anything you zoob, hyperbole may be so exaggerated as to be literally impossible in reality, for example, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of the heavens.

As for the question, even R Jonah Hinds answered that, but it was too sensible for you to grasp, seemingly ...[text shortened]... he is strongly heterosexual in response to your homosexual urging.'

Thankyou R Jonah Hinds.

'The relevance is clear to all but the insane or Satan crazed. He is obviously relating that he is strongly heterosexual in response to your homosexual urging.'


this is exactly what everybody was thinking. rj was saying what we all think you were doing. now you explain why you think your response indicates you are strongly hetrosexual, because it must be different to why we all think it indicates you are strongly hetrosexual. after 30 or 40 posts you are still unable to clearly explain what you meant in your response to the guy who suggested you were gay.

Originally posted by stellspalfie
'The relevance is clear to all but the insane or Satan crazed. He is obviously relating that he is strongly heterosexual in response to your homosexual urging.'


this is exactly what everybody was thinking. rj was saying what we all think you were doing. now you explain why you think your response indicates you are strongly hetrosexual, because it m ...[text shortened]... able to clearly explain what you meant in your response to the guy who suggested you were gay.

yawn I have explained it once, i will not do so again and caissad4 is a chick, not a guy.